Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front
Portability
55
Imaging
54
Features
82
Overall
65

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Successor is Olympus TG-4
Panasonic FZ1000 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
  • 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
  • Introduced February 2019
  • Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview

Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is relatively similar but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") feature different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-3 was announced 5 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-3 scores vs the FZ1000 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II

 TG-3 FZ1000 II 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-3

 FZ1000 II TG-3 
IntroducedFebruary 2019March 2014More modern by 59 months
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1240k460kSharper screen (+780k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II

 TG-3 FZ1000 II 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has proportions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") and a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 and the FZ1000 II.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and FZ1000 II is 90 and 55 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ1000 II.

All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FZ1000 II Portrait photography advice
37
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
72
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FZ1000 II Street photography highlights
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
71
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW formats
supports focus by touch
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Sports photography information
Panasonic FZ1000 II Sports photography information
47
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery (330 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
69
great zoom range (25-400mm 16.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ1000 II Travel photography highlights
74
better than average battery (330 shots)
environment proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
67
supports bluetooth
supports focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (400mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography info
Panasonic FZ1000 II Landscape photography info
56
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
better than average battery (330 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
65
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-3
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ1000 II
34
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
67
rather wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
 Olympus Tough TG-3Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Tough TG-3 Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-03-31 2019-02-18
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 25-400mm (16.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8-4.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,240k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 13.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync.
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 gr (0.54 lbs) 808 gr (1.78 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images 350 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-92B DMW-BLC12PP
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $350 $898