Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Introduced February 2019
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is relatively similar but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") feature different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-3 was announced 5 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-3 scores vs the FZ1000 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-3 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-3
FZ1000 II | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2019 | March 2014 | More modern by 59 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-3 | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has proportions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") and a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 and the FZ1000 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and FZ1000 II is 90 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ1000 II.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 808 gr (1.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $350 | $898 |