Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was announced 16 months later than the EX2F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-3 grades versus the EX2F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung EX2F
| TG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | December 2012 | More recent by 16 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-3
| EX2F | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung EX2F
| TG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 and the EX2F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and EX2F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $478 |
