Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A390, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-3 was announced 3 years after the A390 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-3 matches up versus the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A390
TG-3 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 45 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus TG-3
A390 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A390
TG-3 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 comes with outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-3 against the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5987/c59871aa5a81042dbbf3d0425234fdeeaf7e5b72" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ab10/2ab109bdcf4d0f8bfea34502899ba2b3e566ab7f" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The image here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and A390.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f13b0/f13b02b886281f840dd71d90cce50e9b14bb3111" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64fc2/64fc202759810dd4c1159a70880f5d0f2f1127b7" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 230 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $350 | $500 |