Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S2100, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and S2100 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-3 was introduced 4 years after the S2100 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-3 scores versus the S2100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony S2100
| TG-3 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 52 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus TG-3
| S2100 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S2100
| TG-3 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony S2100 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 and Sony S2100 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 compared to the S2100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and S2100 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and S2100.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to show extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $0 |