Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-520 was released 7 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-520 matches up versus the Q-S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax Q-S1
| E-520 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-520
| Q-S1 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | August 2008 | More modern by 72 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax Q-S1
| E-520 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 against the Q-S1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and Q-S1 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Pentax Q-S1 will give more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 8 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 images | 250 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $400 | $250 |