Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus TG-4 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-4 was announced 2 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-4 grades against the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-4 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | December 2012 | Fresher by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-4
XZ-2 iHS | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-4 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-4 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will produce more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer TG-4 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 340 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $379 | $450 |