Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Launched December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-3 was announced 8 months after the EX2F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-3 grades vs the EX2F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung EX2F
| WG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 | December 2012 | More modern by 8 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Pentax WG-3
| EX2F | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung EX2F
| WG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 against the EX2F.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-3 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Pentax WG-3 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $478 |