Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Launched December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-3 was announced 8 months after the EX2F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-3 grades vs the EX2F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung EX2F
| WG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 | December 2012 | More modern by 8 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Pentax WG-3
| EX2F | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung EX2F
| WG-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WG-3 against the EX2F.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-3 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Pentax WG-3 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-07-19 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $478 |