Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched August 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and FX90 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-4 was announced 3 years after the FX90 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-4 matches up against the FX90 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FX90
| TG-4 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 45 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus TG-4
| FX90 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FX90
| TG-4 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX90 has dimensions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 compared to the FX90.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and FX90 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and FX90.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-4 to offer you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger TG-4 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2011-08-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 149 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 200 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $379 | $227 |