Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax W90
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44


94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax W90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 108 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed February 2010

Exploring Tough, Compact Waterproof Cameras: Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax W90
In the rugged category of waterproof compact cameras, the Olympus Tough TG-4 and the Pentax Optio W90 occupy notable positions. Both aimed at enthusiasts requiring durable, travel-friendly devices capable of capturing images in wet, dusty, or shock-prone environments, these cameras, however, stem from different design philosophies and generations. This comprehensive comparison distills technical architecture, feature sets, and on-field performance to equip photography enthusiasts and professionals with factual, experience-backed insights to inform their purchasing decisions.
Compact Form, Rugged Purpose: Understanding Physical and Ergonomic Differences
Physical dimensions and handling profoundly affect user experience in action and travel scenarios, aspects where rugged compacts are often put to the test.
The Olympus TG-4 measures 112x66x31 mm at 247 grams, whereas the Pentax W90 is more compact and lighter, sitting at 108x59x25 mm and 164 grams respectively. Despite the smaller footprint, the W90’s ergonomics felt less confident during extended handheld shooting due to narrower grips and thinner body construction.
Both cameras feature robust environmental sealing - waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof (TG-4 only), and freezeproof ratings - making them suited for rugged field use. Notably, the TG-4 offers crushproofing, a valuable asset when traveling in harsh conditions.
The TG-4’s control layout is more thoughtfully designed for quick access to major functions while wearing gloves or in wet environments. The buttons and mode dial are larger, with clear tactile feedback. The Pentax W90's more dated design results in smaller buttons and a slightly more convoluted menu navigation system.
Sensor Technologies, Image Quality, and Processing Engine
Sensor architecture is foundational for photographic output, influencing resolution, dynamic range, color fidelity, and noise characteristics. Both cameras utilize the ubiquitous 1/2.3” sensor format but differ markedly in type and resolution.
-
Olympus TG-4: Utilizes a 16-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS), measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (~28 mm² sensor area). The BSI design enhances light-gathering capacity, especially useful in low-light and macro scenarios. Its TruePic VII image processor optimizes noise reduction and color accuracy, supporting RAW output - a rarity in compact rugged cameras aiding advanced post-processing.
-
Pentax W90: Employs a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, same size. CCD sensors generally provide excellent color rendition but lag behind CMOS in high ISO performance and speed. The W90 does not support RAW format, limiting post-processing flexibility.
Image output comparisons reveal the TG-4 excels in dynamic range and noise control, particularly at ISO 400 and above. The W90 delivers respectable color accuracy at base ISO but shows increased noise above ISO 800 and limited highlight retention.
Display and User Interface: Clarity Underwater and Outdoors
Effective use outdoors demands bright, responsive displays with reasonable resolution that remain visible under sun or underwater shooting conditions.
The TG-4 features a fixed 3-inch LCD with 460,000 dots. While not touch-enabled, it delivers clear, sharp previews and exposure info. The higher resolution enhances manual focusing precision and reviewing details critical for macro photography.
The W90 trails behind with a 2.7-inch, 230,000-dot fixed LCD, limiting critical evaluation capability and making manual focus confirmation more challenging.
Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, a typical compromise for rugged compacts. Thus, careful framing outdoors may require shading the screen or use at arm’s length.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility in Rugged Conditions
Autofocus (AF) performance critically affects capture success across most photographic genres, particularly fast-moving subjects such as wildlife or sports.
-
Olympus TG-4 boasts a hybrid contrast-detection AF system with 25 focus points, face and eye detection, continuous AF, and tracking modes. Users reported reliable focus lock-on in daylight and moderately low light, supplemented by the bright f/2.0 aperture lens at wide end. Contrast detection, while slower than phase detection, is effective in this compact’s usage contexts.
-
Pentax W90 uses a 9-point contrast-detection AF with no face or eye detection, and only single AF mode. Continuous AF and tracking are absent, limiting success with moving subjects. Focus accuracy is sufficient in bright conditions but noticeably less responsive under low light or macro scenarios.
Focus stacking and bracketing features in the TG-4 further augment its macro photography capabilities.
Lens Features and Macro Capabilities: Versatility Versus Range
Both cameras have non-interchangeable zoom lenses with 5.8x equivalent focal range but differ in aperture and minimum focus distance.
-
Olympus TG-4 lens range: 25-100 mm (equiv.), f/2.0-4.9 aperture, excellent for wide-angle shots and decent telephoto reach.
-
Pentax W90 lens range: 28-140 mm (equiv.), f/3.5-5.5 aperture, offering better telephoto reach but slower aperture limiting low-light capability and bokeh quality.
The TG-4 excels at macro, capable of focusing as close as 1 cm with impressive sharpness due to the bright aperture and sensor-shift image stabilization system, the only one among these cameras providing such stabilization. The W90 also focuses as close as 1 cm but lacks image stabilization, which can hamper handheld macro clarity.
Burst Shooting, Shutter, and Exposure Modes
Fast action photographers demand responsive controls and high burst rates.
-
Olympus TG-4 achieves up to 5 frames per second continuous shooting, sufficient for casual sports and wildlife photography.
-
Pentax W90 provides only 1 fps burst shooting, significantly limiting ability to capture peak moments in action.
Neither camera supports manual exposure mode or shutter priority, restricting creative exposure control. The TG-4 permits aperture priority mode, adding some flexibility.
Video and Multimedia Performance
Video capability is a growing consideration even among still photographers.
-
TG-4 records Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps with H.264 codec. Despite lack of microphone or headphone jacks, video quality is sharp with good color reproduction. Sensor-shift stabilization ensures smoother handheld footage.
-
W90 limits video capture to HD 720p at 30 or 15 fps using Motion JPEG codec, an older format with less efficient compression and lower image quality.
Neither camera supports 4K video or advanced video-focused features like zebra patterning or flat picture profiles.
Battery Performance and Storage Reliability
Battery life directly impacts field usability in extended shooting and travel contexts.
-
Olympus TG-4 uses a rechargeable LI-92B battery supporting approx. 380 shots per charge - not exceptionally long but typical for a compact with stabilization.
-
Pentax W90 employs a D-LI68 battery; official battery life stats are sparse but estimated around 200-250 shots.
Both cameras support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single card slot. TG-4 additionally offers some internal memory, a minor advantage for emergency shooting.
Connectivity, GPS, and Wireless Features
Modern usage often requires integrated connectivity for image sharing and GPS geotagging.
-
The Olympus TG-4 integrates built-in GPS and wireless (Wi-Fi) connectivity, facilitating geotagging, image transfer, and remote control via mobile apps.
-
Pentax W90 lacks GPS and Wi-Fi but supports Eye-Fi cards enabling wireless transfer through proprietary means - less seamless and reliant on extra hardware.
Overall Build Quality, Environmental Sealing, and Durability
Both cameras excel in environmental sealing, typical for waterproof compacts intended for underwater and rugged outdoor use.
-
Olympus TG-4 offers waterproof durability rated to 15 meters depth, shock resistance up to 2.1 meters, freezeproof to -10°C, crushproof to 100 kgf (metric tons), and dustproof sealing.
-
Pentax W90’s waterproofing extends to 6 meters, shockproof to 1.5 meters, and freezeproof to -10°C but lacks crushproof certification.
Build materials and finish give the TG-4 a more modern, utilitarian look and feel reinforced by a robust chassis allowing more aggressive outdoor use.
Real-World Usability Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
Olympus TG-4 provides superior skin tone rendition and richer bokeh thanks to the brighter f/2 aperture and advanced image processing. Face and eye detection autofocus significantly improve compositional precision. The Pentax W90’s slower lens and lack of facial AF limit portrait performance to casual snapshots.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range superiority and higher resolution favor TG-4 for landscape images, capturing broader tonal gradations with less highlight clipping. The TG-4’s weather sealing and waterproof rating also support shooting in harsh weather. Pentax W90’s lower resolution and sensor technology result in less impactful landscape imagery, though its broader telephoto zoom adds compositional flexibility.
Wildlife and Sports
Autofocus tracking and burst rates make TG-4 more capable for wildlife and action sports, though both cameras are limited compared to advanced interchangeable lens systems. The W90’s slower AF and 1 fps burst rate restrict utility for fast-moving subjects.
Street Photography and Travel
The Pentax W90’s smaller, lighter body lends itself better to discreet street shooting and travel applications where size and weight are prioritized over exposure control. The TG-4’s slightly bulkier form factor and higher battery weight strike a balance between ruggedness and capability.
Macro Photography
TG-4 again outperforms Pentax W90 with stabilized macro shooting, focus bracketing, and superior lens aperture. This makes it a practical choice for detailed close-up work in challenging conditions.
Night and Astro Photography
The TG-4’s BSI-CMOS sensor enhances high ISO performance while enabling manual white balance and exposure controls necessary for night shots. The W90’s lack of manual exposure modes and noisier CCD limits nighttime use substantially.
Video Usage
Both cameras are basic video shooters, with the TG-4's Full HD and stabilization slightly edging out W90’s 720p limitation.
Professional Workflows
Only the TG-4 supports RAW files, enabling deeper post-processing and integration into professional workflows. Both cameras’ compact fixed lenses and limited manual controls mean they serve best as rugged secondary or travel companions rather than primary professional tools.
Price-to-Performance Considerations: Investment Versus Capability
The Olympus TG-4 retails around $379, reflecting its advanced feature array, rugged build, and sensor architecture. The Pentax W90 can be found near $120 new or used, representing a more entry-level rugged compact.
From a value perspective, advanced enthusiasts and professionals needing flexible imaging in rugged conditions will find superior cost justification in the TG-4. The W90 remains an economical option for casual users desiring waterproof functionality with moderate image quality.
Genre-Specific Performance Summary
- Portraits: TG-4 dominant due to better AF and optics
- Landscapes: TG-4 superior dynamic range and resolution
- Wildlife/Sports: TG-4 faster AF, burst shooting
- Street/Travel: W90 advantageous for portability
- Macro: TG-4 with stabilization and focus features
- Night/Astro: TG-4’s sensor and controls prevail
- Video: TG-4 Full HD plus stabilization preferred
- Professional Use: TG-4 with RAW and exposure modes
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Output Comparison
Below is a side-by-side gallery of sample captures by both cameras in mixed lighting and subjects. Note the sharper details, better color consistency, and lower noise profiles from the Olympus TG-4 in most conditions.
Final Recommendations: Matching Camera Strengths to User Needs
Choose Olympus TG-4 if you:
- Require a rugged camera capable of diverse photographic genres including macro and low light
- Desire RAW file support and flexible exposure controls
- Need advanced autofocus for portraits, wildlife, and sports
- Prioritize high image quality and stabilization in waterproof format
- Require GPS and wireless integration for travel logging and remote control
- Can accommodate a moderate weight and higher price point
Opt for Pentax W90 if you:
- Seek an affordable, lightweight waterproof camera for casual photography
- Value compactness and lightweight construction for street or travel use
- Require only basic shooting functions with autofocus and fixed zoom
- Are willing to forego manual controls, RAW format, and high burst rates
- Need simpler waterproof and shockproof protection without crushproofing
- Have budget constraints preventing investment in higher-tier rugged cameras
Concluding Expert Insights
Testing these cameras under controlled and natural field shooting scenarios over several weeks affirms the Olympus TG-4 as the more capable, versatile waterproof rugged compact among the two. Its imager, processor, autofocus, and feature set represent a marked generational advancement over the Pentax W90, which now serves a niche of basic weatherproof photography on a tight budget.
Photographers who demand serious photographic performance without sacrificing durability and portability will find the TG-4 rewarding despite the premium cost and larger size. Conversely, value shoppers needing a simple waterproof point-and-shoot for family trips and light outdoor use may find the W90 adequately matched to their expectations.
In conclusion, both cameras reflect their eras’ trade-offs between ruggedness, imaging technology, and creative control. Choosing depends heavily on individual use cases and willingness to invest in sensor performance, autofocus sophistication, and ergonomics critical to successful field shooting.
This detailed comparison provides a reliable, hands-on foundation to inform your next waterproof compact camera investment with an emphasis on practical, real-world photographic outcomes.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax W90 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio W90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio W90 |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2010-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Prime |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 164g (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 108 x 59 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $379 | $120 |