Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
Pentax WG-2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WG-2 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was unveiled 3 years after the WG-2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-4 scores against the WG-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax WG-2
| TG-4 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 39 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus TG-4
| WG-2 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax WG-2
| TG-4 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-4 features external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 versus the WG-2.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and WG-2 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and WG-2.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-4 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography info
Pentax WG-2 Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection focusing
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (247g)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
Pentax WG-2 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery life (380 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Travel photography camera
great battery life (380 shots)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
environment proofing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
Landscape photography with Pentax WG-2
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
great battery life (380 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (16MP)
environment proofing
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging details
Pentax WG-2 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
heavier than competition (247 grams)
reasonably wide (28mm)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 260 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $379 | $350 |
