Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-4 was announced 4 years after the HZ35W which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-4 matches up vs the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung HZ35W
TG-4 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | June 2010 | Newer by 59 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus TG-4
HZ35W | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ35W
TG-4 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 comes with outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 versus the HZ35W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The image below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and HZ35W.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to give you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $379 | $300 |