Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony WX220, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was launched 15 months later than the WX220 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-4 grades versus the WX220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony WX220
| TG-4 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 15 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus TG-4
| WX220 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony WX220
| TG-4 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 has got outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony WX220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 against the WX220.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and WX220 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and WX220.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony WX220 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 210 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $379 | $198 |