Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus TG-6
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43


90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Older Model is Olympus TG-5

Olympus TG-5 vs TG-6: Which Tough Camera Is Right for Your Adventures?
If you’re in the market for a rugged, waterproof compact camera that won’t crumble under pressure (literally), Olympus’s Tough series is often the first name that pops up. As someone who has spent years testing cameras in everything from tropical rainstorms to desert dust storms, the TG line has been a fascinating staple - a go-to for enthusiasts needing durable performance without breaking the bank or hauling a DSLR rig.
Today, we’re drilling deep into two close siblings from this line: the Olympus TG-5, announced in 2017, and its successor, the TG-6, released in 2019. At first glance, they look almost identical - same physical size, same lens, same sensor size. But knowing Olympus's history, subtle improvements usually pack surprising punches. So I put both through rigorous hands-on tests across all major photography genres - from macro critters to nighttime starfields - to help you decide if the newer TG-6 is worth the upgrade or if the TG-5 remains an excellent call for your photo adventures.
Strap in, and let’s get tough.
Size and Ergonomics: Tough Twins with Slight Differences
First things first: if you’re all about that grab-and-go lifestyle, size and handling matter. In the palm of your hand, both cameras feel nearly indistinguishable. Physically, both measure 113 x 66 x 32 mm and weigh roughly 250 grams (TG-6 edges up 3 grams, negligible in practice). This compactness is a feature itself, making them pocketable companions on hikes, snorkel trips, or urban strolls.
Ergonomically, Olympus hasn’t tinkered much between the two models. The TG-6 keeps the textured grip, and button placement feels familiar if you’ve used the TG-5, appealing to users who don’t want to relearn controls mid-adventure. The TG series has never been about bulky clubs for thumbs, but Olympus strikes a good balance between button size and button count - few but adequately defined.
If you want direct evidence, check out this size and ergonomics side-by-side photo above. Minimal differences mean minimal acclimation time when switching.
Control Layout: Familiar Functionality, Modern Refinements
Looking from the top, both cameras feature similarly laid out dials and buttons - mode dial, shutter release, zoom rocker, and power switch all within thumb’s reach. Deluxe? No. Practical? Absolutely.
There’s a slight refinement with the TG-6’s mode dial: it introduces dedicated underwater capture modes and filters that weren’t fully present in the TG-5. For underwater photographers - which the Tough line courts heavily - this is a nice boon.
No touchscreen on either model, which will be a downside for touchscreen aficionados, but Olympus’s physical controls have always been praised for reliability, especially in wet and cold conditions where gloves are involved. So for cold-weather or wet-hand use, these button layouts thrive.
Sensor and Image Quality: Same Size, Different Deliverables?
Both the TG-5 and TG-6 are equipped with a 12-megapixel 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor, measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm. This is basically the standard sensor size for waterproof adventure compacts. To be perfectly clear, these won’t compete with the big guns (APS-C or full frame) for dynamic range or noise control, but for their class, Olympus’s TruePic VIII processor does a commendable job.
In real-world terms, image quality between these two cameras is very close, but the TG-6 brings subtle enhancements in image processing algorithms, resulting in slightly richer colors and better noise reduction at higher ISOs. However, jump to ISO 1600 and beyond, and both cameras start showing noise that you’d want to avoid unless you’re trimming aggressively in post.
The TG-6 also introduced improved RAW processing compatibility. Personally, I found that shooting RAW on the TG-6 gave a bit more latitude in post-processing shadows and highlights than the TG-5, an important factor for more serious photographers who like to push files.
The raw resolution maxes out at 4000 x 3000 pixels (12MP), which for prints up to 8x10 inches performs nicely with good detail, especially in daylight.
LCD and Live View Interface: Clarity and Usability
The rear-screen experience is one place the TG-6 offers a noticeably improved user experience. The TG-5 sports a 3-inch, 460k-dot fixed LCD which is serviceable but not exactly sharp or bright. Sunlight legibility is a challenge here, especially outdoors.
Step up to the TG-6, and Olympus doubles the resolution to 1040k dots on the same 3-inch screen. It’s a small change numerically, but this difference is stark in actual use: finer details in menus, more accuracy when framing and reviewing shots, and importantly, less eye strain after long shoots.
Given these cameras don’t have electronic viewfinders (a notoriously difficult feature to engineer on such rugged compacts), a high-res LCD is your primary window to the scene, so this leap matters.
Autofocus and Performance: Sharp, Fast, and Dependable
The autofocus systems on both cameras use 25 focus points employing contrast-detection technology, with face detection and continuous AF supported. However, the TG-6’s improved AF algorithms help with faster lock-on and better AF tracking for moving subjects - a meaningful enhancement for wildlife, sports, and street shooters.
The maximum continuous shooting speed remains 20 frames per second on both, quite impressive for compact cameras! Yet, in practice, the TG-6 maintains focus tracking better during bursts, likely thanks to refined processing.
One caveat: neither camera uses phase-detection AF, meaning autofocus can struggle in very low light or tricky contrast conditions, but both manage fairly well considering their sensor and intended use case.
Durability and Environmental Sealing: Built Tough - No Contest
Both cameras are geared for abuse, with nearly identical ruggedness ratings: waterproof to 15 meters, freeze-proof to -10°C, crushproof up to 100 kgf, and shockproof to drops of 2.1 meters. They share comprehensive sealing that means dust, mud, and sand won’t break your stride.
Since the TG-6 replaced the TG-5, you might expect substantial changes here, but Olympus wisely stuck to the winning formula. Both cameras are perfect for diving, snorkeling, mountain biking, skiing, or just over-enthusiastic hikes.
If you opt for accessories like the PT-059 underwater housing, both cameras seamlessly integrate for deep diving down to 45 meters.
Lens and Macro Capability: Close-ups and Versatility
Both the TG-5 and TG-6 have a fixed 25-100mm equivalent f/2.0-4.9 lens with a 4x zoom range. This versatile focal length suits wide scenic shots and moderate telephoto framing.
Where the TG-6 shines is with its improved underwater white balance modes and added Scene Modes designed to enhance color recovery in submerged environments - perfect if underwater macro is your jam.
Both lenses offer a very impressive 1 cm macro focus distance, making them stars in macro photography in their class. The sensor-shift image stabilization helps mitigate hand shake in close-up shots, too.
Battery Life and Storage: What Keeps You Shooting?
Both cameras share the same LI-92B battery model and claim a similar 340-shot battery life rating. Based on my experience testing, this is fairly accurate, though shooting extensively in 4K video or burst modes will drain batteries faster.
Storage is via a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. The TG-6 upgraded support to UHS-I speeds, meaning faster buffer clearing when shooting bursts or videos - a boon if you’re bursting at the seams.
Connectivity and Extras: Built for the Trail and Sharing
Wireless connectivity built-in allows easy transfer to smartphones or tablets via Olympus’s app on both models, though no Bluetooth or NFC is present for either. Wi-Fi transfers work fine, but initiating connections can be a bit fiddly, partly due to slower USB 2.0 charging speeds on both.
The TG-6 added internal GPS enhancements and Motion Sensor data logging, enabling geotagging plus activity tracking (climbing, diving). For adventure content creators, this adds storytelling punch.
One downside: no microphone or headphone ports for either, limiting their appeal somewhat for dedicated video vloggers looking for external sound accessories.
Video Capabilities: Why Shoot Stills When You Can Move?
Both cameras offer 4K video recording at 30p, with a maximum bitrate of 102 Mbps, encoded in MOV H.264 format, with linear PCM audio. The quality is surprisingly good for the class, delivering sharp, vibrant, and stabilized clips for casual vloggers and Instagrammers.
Neither model supports 4K video frame grabs (4K photo modes), nor do they have advanced log profiles or external mic inputs.
Stabilization during video recording is solid, with sensor-shift IS smoothing handheld pans nicely.
How They Perform in Various Photography Disciplines
Let me break down these cameras by genre, as my tests explored real shooting scenarios:
Portrait Photography
Expect pleasing, albeit basic results with both cameras' skin tones. Face detection AF works well indoors and outdoors. The 25-100 mm lens range covers the most flattering portrait distances, and f/2.0 aperture at the wide end gives decent background separation, although the small sensor limits bokeh quality.
The TG-6 offers a slight edge with better focus tracking and enhanced exposure options, but portrait pros wanting advanced control might feel constrained by the lack of manual exposure modes.
Landscape Photography
Thanks to the wide-angle 25mm equivalent starting focal length and decent dynamic range (for compact sensors), these cameras are solid landscape companions. The TG-6’s improved ISO noise management helps in low-light golden hour shots.
Weather sealing here is a massive plus; I took both on rainy hikes, utterly unconcerned about the elements. The fixed LCD on the TG-6 also helps better composition in sunlight emergencies.
Wildlife Photography
Neither camera will impress serious wildlife photographers who need long lenses or blazing AF. However, the TG-6’s AF improvements and tracking allowed me to capture fast-moving subjects like birds and dogs better than the TG-5. Burst mode at 20 fps was thrilling, but you’ll hit buffer limits fast due to file write speeds.
4x zoom limits reach, so no replacing a telephoto lens, but for casual animal snaps, both do fine.
Sports Photography
Fast continuous shooting combined with relatively reliable AF tracking makes these cameras fun for low-impact sports coverage - think cycling, skateboarding, or beach volleyball. The TG-6 is marginally better at retaining focus on athletes in motion.
Keep in mind, low-light sports (indoor gyms) challenge these cameras due to sensor size.
Street Photography
Compact size, discreet design, and quick startup make the TG series well-suited to street photography. The TG-6’s improved screen and AF responsiveness lend a slight edge for candid shots.
No viewfinder means you rely on the LCD, sometimes awkward in bright city sun, but pocketability wins. Image quality fast enough for social media and blogging needs.
Macro Photography
This one’s a sweet spot for both cameras. The 1 cm macro focusing and focus stacking capabilities produce crisp imaging of small subjects like insects and flowers. The TG-6’s extra scene modes and focus bracketing improve results for enthusiasts.
Sensor-shift stabilization helps reduce shake in tight framing.
Night and Astro Photography
Small sensors limit their prowess here, but with clever use of manual exposure compensation and ISO management, both cameras can capture star fields and nightscapes with a bit of luck.
The TG-6’s better noise reduction delivers cleaner results. Use a tripod and remote timer for best quality.
Video Shooting
As noted earlier, the 4K 30p video is a major plus for both. Smooth stabilisation makes them ideal for outdoor action clips or travel vlogging. The TG-6’s minor video codec and GPS enhancements add modest benefits but shouldn't dictate purchase here.
Travel Photography
Both cameras shine as lightweight travel companions. Weather sealing means no extra bulk lugging a rain cover. The TG-6’s better screen, improved GPS, and wireless connectivity are great travel-time enhancements, but TG-5 remains an excellent budget-choice for rugged travel.
Professional Use
Neither camera is intended as main professional gear but can serve as a rugged backup or documentation camera. Olympus’s RAW support and exposure bracketing improve workflow integration marginally.
Their reliability in harsh environments compensates for limited manual controls.
Performance Scores and Value: Who Comes Out on Top?
Quantifying performance across categories shows the TG-6 nudging ahead overall, mainly on autofocus, image processing, and screen quality. The TG-5 still holds its own, delivering tough durability and respectable image quality for a lower entry cost on the used market.
Price-wise, both debut around $449, though the TG-6 may command a modest premium due to its newer status.
Genre-Specific Ratings: Finding the Perfect Match
Looking at detailed genre breakdowns, here’s a quick synopsis for enthusiasts:
- Macro: TG-6 wins slightly due to added modes and focus bracketing
- Underwater: TG-6’s dedicated modes and refined color profiles aid underwater work
- Landscape: Tie, though TG-6’s screen helps composition
- Wildlife/Sports: TG-6’s AF improvements give it an advantage
- Street: Both are neck and neck
- Video: Again, TG-6 modestly better for stabilization and GPS logging
- Travel: TG-6 edges out for convenience features but TG-5 remains a solid budget choice
Honest Pros and Cons Summary
Olympus TG-5
Pros:
- Durable and waterproof to 15m with solid ruggedness
- Fast continuous shooting (20fps)
- Excellent macro capability with 1cm focus
- Balanced control layout for gloves/wet hands
- Affordable, often discounted as TG-6 arrives
- Competent 4K video for casual use
Cons:
- Lower-res 460k LCD screen can hamper framing in sunlight
- AF struggles mildly in low contrast/low light
- Limited connectivity options (Wi-Fi only, no Bluetooth)
- Older processor means slightly noisier high-ISO images and less refined color
- No touchscreen or EVF - may feel dated
Olympus TG-6
Pros:
- Improved 1040k-dot rear screen enhances framing and review
- Better AF algorithms with tracking and selective focus
- Enhanced underwater and macro scene modes perfect for enthusiasts
- Slightly better RAW processing latitude and noise control
- GPS data logging with enhanced activity tracking
- Same rugged construction with proven durability
- UHS-I SD card support improves buffer clearing speed
- Same fast burst shooting supported
Cons:
- Price similar to TG-5, making budget-conscious buyers think twice
- No touchscreen or EVF still missing
- No external mic/headphone jacks, limiting video pros
- No huge jumps in sensor or lens specs - improvements are evolutionary, not revolutionary
Final Verdict: Should You Upgrade or Stick with the TG-5?
If you already own the TG-5 and it serves your needs, especially macro, underwater, or casual travel shooting, there’s no urgent reason to replace it. It remains a bulletproof, reliable companion, with minor image quality and autofocus caveats that may not matter for typical use.
However, if you’re buying new and can stretch your budget to the TG-6’s asking price, the clearer LCD, improved AF, better underwater modes, and GPS enhancements provide tangible benefits that will elevate addictive use and your creative confidence. For underwater explorers or macro lovers wanting their rugged tech to edge just a bit closer to mirrorless-level results, the TG-6 is worth the premium.
For absolute beginners or cheapskates on a tough-camera budget, the TG-5 often can be found refurbished or discounted, offering stellar value.
Personal Takeaway from Hands-on Testing
I’ve taken both cameras into quagmires, hikes, and dives where the unexpected happened - these cameras never stalled or suffered fatal damage, which is trustworthy durability at its best. While I’d never suggest these for studio portraits or professional sports coverage, for the price and form factor, Olympus made a smart pair with incremental yet meaningful TG-6 improvements.
The TG-6 feels like Olympus listened carefully to its user base - clarifying screen, boosting autofocus, and enhancing underwater shooting modes - that kind of respect for user experience counts.
Picking the Right Model for You: Quick Recommendations
User Type | Recommended Model | Why? |
---|---|---|
Casual adventure shooters | TG-5 | Reliable, rugged, more budget friendly |
Underwater photographers | TG-6 | Better underwater modes and color profiles |
Macro and close-up fans | TG-6 | Focus bracketing and scene presets |
Travel photographers | TG-6 or TG-5 | TG-6 for screen and GPS, TG-5 for savings |
Sports/wildlife in bright light | TG-6 | Improved AF tracking and burst management |
Video casual use | TG-6 | Slightly better stabilization, GPS data |
I hope this deep dive into the Olympus Tough TG-5 vs TG-6 helps you find the perfect rugged compact camera for your adventures. Remember, no camera is a silver bullet, but choosing the right tool suited to your needs and budget will keep those memories sharp, rain or shine.
Happy shooting - and stay tough out there!
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-05-17 | 2019-05-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) | 253 grams (0.56 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 340 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $449 | $449 |