Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P2
- Later Model is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus SH-2, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-P3 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-P3 was introduced 4 years earlier than the SH-2 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-P3 matches up against the SH-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus SH-2
E-P3 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-P3
SH-2 | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2015 | August 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus SH-2
E-P3 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P3 offers external dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P3 versus Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P3 and the SH-2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and SH-2 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and SH-2.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P3 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will give you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369g (0.81 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 380 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $399 |