Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-5 was released 8 years after the FS12 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-5 grades versus the FS12 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Panasonic FS12
| TG-5 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 99 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus TG-5
| FS12 | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Panasonic FS12
| TG-5 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-5 has external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-5 versus the FS12.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-5 and FS12 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-5 and FS12.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of images though you should really factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-5 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2017-05-17 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 20.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 250g (0.55 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $449 | $228 |
