Olympus TG-6 vs Sony RX100 VII
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45


88 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony RX100 VII Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 302g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Announced July 2019
- Replaced the Sony RX100 VI

Compact Showdown: Olympus TG-6 Versus Sony RX100 VII - A Deep Dive for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing the right compact camera is surprisingly complex. Whether you’re a rugged outdoor adventurer or a demanding enthusiast craving large sensor quality, today’s market offers wildly different options under the “compact” umbrella. In this detailed comparison, I take the Olympus Tough TG-6 and the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII head-to-head. Both models debuted in 2019 - the TG-6 in May and the RX100 VII in July - but they target profoundly different use cases and photographer personalities.
Having spent many hours testing these cameras in varied real-world conditions, as well as measuring their technical performance and analyzing their ergonomics, lenses, and shooting modes, I’ll share how they stack up across a breadth of photographic disciplines and beyond. I’ll also blend technical insights with practical experience to help you decide which fits your needs and budget best.
Let’s start by looking at the two contenders side by side.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
One of the first practical considerations when comparing cameras is how they feel to hold and operate in daily use.
The Olympus TG-6 - at 113×66×32 mm and 253 grams - is a sturdy compact designed for abuse. Its chunky, grippy chassis integrates extensive weather sealing making it waterproof (up to 15m), crushproof, shockproof, dustproof, and freezeproof. This isn’t your typical camera - this is an ultimate outdoor rugged tool.
The Sony RX100 VII is smaller in footprint (102×58×43 mm) and a bit heavier (302 g), but far more refined ergonomically for everyday shooting. It’s sleek, with a well-thought-out control layout and a premium feel. It’s designed as a “pocketable large sensor compact” for enthusiasts seeking DSLR-quality images without the bulk.
Sony’s intuitive top control wheel, levered zoom, and pop-up EVF immediately communicate a confidence-inspiring grip and responsiveness. The TG-6, by contrast, uses larger buttons designed for operation with gloves and outdoor gear but has no viewfinder or customizable controls. Its fixed lens and limited manual input modes reflect its simpler target audience.
While both sport 3” LCDs - in fact, the TG-6’s is fixed and non-touch, whereas the RX100 VII’s screen is tilting and touch-sensitive - the RX visually offers more flexibility. That said, the TG-6’s buttons provide tactile reassurance in wetter or colder conditions where touchscreen usability might lag.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Compact Sensor Dynamics
The sensor is the beating heart of any camera, fundamentally influencing image quality.
The TG-6 has a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with a 12MP resolution. This sensor size is common in rugged and travel compacts, optimized mainly for snapshots rather than high-end image fidelity. The 1/2.3" sensor area (~28 mm²) limits dynamic range and noise performance, which is reflected in its DxO untested status but empirically apparent in low light and high ISO shots.
In contrast, the Sony RX100 VII packs a much larger 1” BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm), 20MP resolution, and excellent image quality credentials, scoring a solid DxO Mark overall rating of 63. Its sensor area (~116 mm²) is roughly four times bigger than the TG-6’s, allowing much better dynamic range, superior noise control, and richer color depth (DxOMark Color Depth: 21.8 bits vs. TG-6’s untested).
What does this mean practically? The RX100 VII delivers crisper, cleaner images with more latitude for shadow recovery - essential for landscape and portrait work. The TG-6’s images show more noise and less detail in complex highlights but still perform admirably in bright conditions and specialized modes like macro.
Lens and Autofocus: Versatility Versus Robustness
Lens design is another major differentiator given the fixed lens nature of these cameras.
- TG-6 lens: 25-100mm equivalent (4x zoom), very bright at F2.0-4.9, optimized for macro work with a minimum focus distance as close as 1cm.
- RX100 VII lens: 24-200mm equivalent (8.3x zoom), a versatile telephoto range with an aperture of F2.8-4.5, and a minimum focus distance of 8cm.
The TG-6 shines in extreme close-up photography, offering true macro capability with superb detail. Its fast f/2.0 aperture at wide angle also aids low light situations but falls off towards telephoto. The RX100 VII’s lens is broader in range, extending into telephoto sports and wildlife domains, with good optical quality maintained throughout. It’s the more flexible system overall.
Autofocus is a vital aspect where the RX100 VII’s high-tech hybrid AF system (with a mix of phase-detect and contrast-detect points, face and eye detection including animal eye AF) surpasses the TG-6’s contrast-detect only system with 25 AF points.
This AF sophistication translates to quicker, more reliable tracking of moving subjects - paramount in wildlife and sports shooting. The TG-6 keeps up for static or slow-moving scenes but struggles with fast action and complex focusing scenarios.
LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots Your Way
LCD and EVF usability can profoundly affect shooting experience, especially in bright outdoor or fast-moving situations.
The TG-6’s fixed 3.0” display with 1040k-dot resolution is bright and clear but, without touchscreen or articulating ability, can be limiting in creative compositions. The absence of any viewfinder means you’re dependent on this screen even in glaring sunlight.
The RX100 VII, however, features a tiltable 3.0” touchscreen (921k dots) alongside a pop-up electronic viewfinder boasting 2.36 million dots and near-100% coverage. This EVF provides an invaluable eye-level composing experience to improve stability and precision, especially outdoors. Touch AF and menu navigation also speed up workflow.
For serious street and travel photographers craving discretion and swift operation, the RX’s interface wins hands down.
Image Quality in Practice: Samples from Both Cameras
Nothing replaces direct image comparisons when judging quality.
Reviewing my test shoots confirms expectations:
-
The RX100 VII delivers rich color rendition, razor-sharp detail, and excellent subject separation. Skin tones in portraits appeared natural, with eye detection helping achieve tack-sharp focus on eyes even when subjects moved. Bokeh is silky and smooth, thanks to the larger sensor and faster aperture.
-
The TG-6 excels at macro shots - capturing minuscule details on insects and flowers vividly, aided by its dedicated microscope mode. However, landscapes and portraits show lower detail and more noise, especially under subdued lighting.
In low light, noise becomes evident on the TG-6 images at ISO 800 and above, while the RX100 VII maintains usable image quality up to ISO 3200 or more. This directly impacts versatility in the field.
Burst Shooting and Autofocus Tracking: Catching the Decisive Moment
With both cameras offering 20fps continuous shooting, speed isn’t the bottleneck here, but AF tracking capability makes all the difference.
The RX100 VII’s hybrid AF system effortlessly locks on to fast-moving subjects during sports and wildlife shoots, making it possible to capture crisply-focused sequences consistently. Its sophisticated Eye AF and animal eye AF work marvels for portrait and wildlife photographers alike.
The TG-6’s tracking struggles to maintain accurate focus during quick action, better suited for still subjects or slow movement.
Durability and Environmental Performance: Built for the Extremes vs Premium Sensibility
The TG-6’s ruggedness is unmatched. Its environmental sealing and comprehensive shockproofing enable use underwater, in freezing temperatures, and rough terrain without additional protection. For adventure photographers engaging in kayaking, diving, skiing, or rock climbing, this camera offers unmatched peace of mind.
The Sony RX100 VII lacks weather sealing and rugged protections, instead focusing on precision and image quality in controlled conditions or casual travel scenarios. It’s not designed to withstand drops or submersion but rather to fit unobtrusively into everyday shooting.
Specialized Photography Uses: Where Each Camera Excels
Let’s break down different photography disciplines and see how each camera performs based on technical abilities and real-world testing:
Portrait Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: Eye and face detection AF shines, large sensor delivers superior skin tone rendition and bokeh quality.
- Olympus TG-6: Limited by sensor size and AF; macro portrait close-ups viable but overall lacks sophistication for traditional portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: Wide ISO latitude, dynamic range, and resolution excel; screen and EVF aid composition.
- Olympus TG-6: Serviceable for casual landscapes, but limited noise control and detail undercut quality; ruggedness an advantage in extreme environments.
Wildlife Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: AF tracking, telephoto zoom, and burst shooting empower better capture of fast-moving wildlife.
- Olympus TG-6: Telephoto reach and AF contrast detection less reliable; ruggedness useful if shooting in harsh conditions.
Sports Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: High frame rate and excellent autofocus tracking ideal for fast action.
- Olympus TG-6: Burst speed good but AF tracking limited; more suited for slower or static sports.
Street Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: Compact size, EVF, and silent shutter (up to 1/32000s) support discretion and versatility.
- Olympus TG-6: Bulkier, no EVF, but ruggedness may appeal in active street scenarios.
Macro Photography
- Olympus TG-6: Standout with 1cm macro focusing and microscope modes.
- Sony RX100 VII: Decent close focusing but lacks dedicated macro tools.
Night/Astro Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: Larger sensor and better noise performance lend to usable astrophotography and night shots.
- Olympus TG-6: Limited high ISO performance and lack of manual controls restrict capability.
Video Capabilities
-
Both capture 4K UHD at 30p - Olympus at 102 Mbps, Sony at 100 Mbps - similar, but:
-
Sony RX100 VII: Superior codec support (XAVC S), microphone input, and touch focus make it more versatile.
-
Olympus TG-6: No microphone port limits audio recording options.
Travel Photography
- Sony RX100 VII: Compact, versatile zoom range, EVF, and tilt screen serve varied scenarios.
- Olympus TG-6: Ruggedness and GPS built-in are excellent for adventure travel, though size is bulkier.
Professional Workflows
- Sony RX100 VII: Supports that professional RAW format workflow better; faster card interfaces support faster data transfer.
- Olympus TG-6: Simple RAW, slower USB 2.0, and limited exposure controls mean it’s more a secondary or backup system.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Reliability
The TG-6’s robust magnesium alloy frame and sealing deliver unmatched resilience, ticking all the boxes for extreme conditions. Freezeproof to -10°C, crushproof under 100 kg, and shockproof against 2.1 m drops - not just bells and whistles but rigorously tested field specifications.
The RX100 VII’s design prioritizes precision engineering and premium materials but lacks weather sealing or shock resistance. Treat it with care; this is a camera for controlled environments rather than a go-anywhere beast.
Battery Life and Storage
The Olympus TG-6 uses the LI-92B battery, offering approximately 340 shots on a charge. Sony’s RX100 VII employs the NP-BX1 battery, rated at roughly 260 shots, which gained mixed reviews in the field for limited endurance, often necessitating spares on long days.
Both support SD cards, with TG-6 supporting UHS-I - sufficient but not top-tier speed compared to newer UHS-II cards used in advanced cameras. Sony’s memory stick compatibility adds flexibility but is largely legacy.
Connectivity and Additional Features
The TG-6 integrates built-in GPS, an essential feature missing on the RX100 VII, which can impact travel and wildlife photographers wanting geotagging without a smartphone.
The RX100 VII improves connectivity with Bluetooth and NFC, enabling rapid pairing with smartphones and remote control apps. The TG-6 has WiFi but lacks Bluetooth/NFC and a microphone input - limitations if you’re into mobile workflows or advanced video production.
Price and Value Proposition
At launch, the Olympus TG-6 retailed near $449, targeting enthusiasts needing rugged durability and decent image quality at an entry-level investment.
The Sony RX100 VII arrived at a far higher $1298 MSRP, reflecting its class-leading sensor, advanced autofocus, and professional features packed into a pocket-sized body.
Is the Sony worth nearly triple the price? For discerning photographers prioritizing image quality, autofocus sophistication, and video options, yes. However, if you’re an explorer needing a camera that laughs when dropped in a river, the TG-6 is incomparable value.
Wrapping Up: Who Should Buy Which?
Both the Olympus TG-6 and Sony RX100 VII excel in very different realms of compact photography:
Recommendation | Olympus TG-6 | Sony RX100 VII |
---|---|---|
Rugged Adventure and Underwater | Ideal - waterproof, shockproof | Not suitable |
Macro and Close-up Enthusiasts | Outstanding macro capabilities | Mediocre close focus |
High Image Quality and Low-light | Limited by sensor size | Excellent large sensor results |
Sports and Wildlife Photography | Limited AF tracking | Best in compact category |
Travel & Street Photography | Bulkier but durable | Highly portable and discreet |
Video Production with Audio Input | No external mic port | Supports microphone input |
Budget-conscious buyers | Excellent value | Premium price point |
Final Thoughts From My Testing Bench
During my extensive outdoor testing, the Olympus TG-6 proved a rugged companion for adventures where most cameras would falter - diving into ocean spray, hiking icy trails - delivering surprisingly capable images in bright light and macro scenarios. Its limitations around sensor size and autofocus are understandable trade-offs for this level of durability.
The Sony RX100 VII was a joy to shoot with in daylight, indoor events, and quick street scenarios, impressing with razor-sharp, clean images and smart AF technologies that gave me confidence in unpredictable action photography. Though pricier and more fragile, it’s a power-packed compact that bridges the gap between amateur and professional use with remarkable success.
If you can afford the RX100 VII and seek image quality plus flexibility, it wins outright. But if your shooting adventures demand “go anywhere, shoot anything” reliability with decent results, the TG-6 is a stalwart companion without equal.
Choosing between these two cameras boils down to your lifestyle, shooting style, and priorities. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer - only the right tool for your unique vision.
I hope this hands-on, data-driven comparison helps you confidently examine your options and find the camera that will inspire your creativity while fitting your practical needs. Happy shooting!
End of article.
Olympus TG-6 vs Sony RX100 VII Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2019-07-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lb) | 302 grams (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 418 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 260 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $449 | $1,298 |