Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung NX1100
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced April 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1000
- Newer Model is Samsung NX2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung NX1100: A Detailed Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When I first laid hands on both the Olympus VG-145 and the Samsung NX1100, I was struck by their radically different approaches to photography despite sounding like close competitors on paper. One is an ultracompact point-and-shoot from 2011, the other a modest entry-level mirrorless released two years later. Yet, their performance gaps and real-world usability - both crushingly relevant to today’s photographers - couldn’t be more apparent.
I’ve spent dozens of hours shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and everyday scenes with these two cameras. Having also tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years in the industry, I’m here to provide you a data-driven, experience-backed comparison between these two models. If you’re a budget-conscious enthusiast or a professional seeking a very specific use-case tool, this deep dive will help you decide which one fits your needs, or if you should look elsewhere.
Strap in, grab a coffee, and let’s unpack what Olympus and Samsung brought to the table - and where they absolutely missed the mark.
Size and Ergonomics: Pocketability vs. Traditional Handling
First impressions matter. The Olympus VG-145 is downright tiny. Sporting an ultracompact body at just 96 x 57 x 19 mm and weighing a featherlight 120 grams, this camera literally disappears inside your pocket. If portability and discretion are your primary concerns, say, for street or travel photography where you want to avoid attracting attention or lugging heavy gear - the VG-145 shines.
Meanwhile, the Samsung NX1100 embraces the classic mirrorless rangefinder style. At 114 x 63 x 37 mm and 222 grams, it’s approximately twice the size and weight of the VG-145. That may not sound like much, but in hand it provides a much more comfortable grip and better control, especially when you want to get serious about framing and manual adjustments.

The VG-145’s ultracompact design sacrifices tactile feedback: the buttons are tiny, and it lacks any sort of dedicated dials for exposure control. It’s clearly a cheapskate’s tool for grab-and-go snapshots. On the other hand, the NX1100 sports more clubs for your thumbs and fingers - logical button placement, a larger grip, and a sense of confidence when shooting handheld.
Ergonomics winner: Samsung NX1100 for control and handling; Olympus VG-145 for sheer portability.
Design and Control Layout: Minimalist vs. Functionality
Comparing their top-down designs underscores their targeted audiences. The VG-145’s top plate is clutter-free with a lone shutter button and mode dial, essential for rapid point-and-shoot use but limiting if you want manual control.
The NX1100’s top view portrays a more mature layout with a dedicated mode dial offering shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes - a significant advantage if you’re serious about creative shooting.

Similarly, the NX1100 has dedicated exposure compensation, manual white balance, and bracketing options. The Olympus... well, it’s pretty much “set it and forget it.” For enthusiasts who crave camera-toophat-style control without diving into bulky DSLRs, the NX1100 is a dream.
Control layout winner: Samsung NX1100 hands down.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s talk sensor tech because this largely dictates image quality - the difference between crisp, rich images versus noisy, muddy photos.
The VG-145 features a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with a modest 14MP resolution. It’s typical ultracompact sensor territory: small physical size (28.07 mm²) limits its ability to gather light, resulting in poor noise performance especially beyond ISO 400. Additionally, CCDs are generally less efficient than modern CMOS sensors.
By contrast, the NX1100 boasts a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor (368.95 mm²) with 20MP resolution, a sensor size over 13 times bigger in surface area! This translates directly into superior dynamic range, higher resolution, and much better performance in low-light conditions.

When I lined up both in low-light portrait sessions, the NX1100's noise levels were impressively tame even at ISO 1600. Skin tones blew me away with natural rendering and smooth gradients. The Olympus struggled, exhibiting harsh grain and washed-out colors past ISO 800.
The DxOmark-derived scores - though unofficial for the VG-145 - tell the tale. The NX1100’s color depth is a strong 23 bits, its dynamic range an excellent 12.5 stops, and low-light ISO rating near 850. The VG-145’s smaller sensor inherently cannot compete.
Image quality winner: Samsung NX1100 - hands-down for any serious photography.
Screen and Interface: Peeking at Your Shots
Both cameras sport fixed 3-inch LCD screens, but their resolutions and underlying tech differ noticeably.
The Olympus has a 230k-pixel TFT screen - quite basic and sometimes hard to see in bright sunlight, which limits its usefulness for critical framing and playback.
Samsung offers a 921k-pixel TFT LCD - 4 times the resolution - with improved clarity and vibrancy which means more confidence in reviewing shots on the fly.

Neither has an electronic viewfinder, which is a missed opportunity on the NX1100, but given its price and era, understandable.
For live view operation, both cameras perform passably, but the NX1100 wins on speed and responsiveness given its more advanced contrast-detection autofocus system and faster refresh rates.
Screen and interface winner: Samsung NX1100 for clarity and usability.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
Here’s where the NX1100’s interchangeable lens mount really shines. Samsung’s NX mount has over 30 native lenses available, spanning primes, zooms, macro, and specialty options plus adapters for manual/glass from other brands.
The fixed lens VG-145 delivers a 26–130mm (5x zoom) lens with modest focal length versatility on the small sensor (equivalent to about 150-750mm on full frame). The maximum apertures of f/2.8 to f/6.5 mean you’ll hit limitations in low light and shallow depth of field control.
Being stuck with a fixed lens translates to compromises in image style potential, especially for macro work or fast-action shooting.
Lens ecosystem/versatility winner: Samsung NX1100, hands down.
Autofocus Performance: Sharp and Quick vs. Basic Contrast Detect
Autofocus is critical, especially for moving subjects or candid moments, so I put both cameras through real-world use testing.
The VG-145 employs a contrast-detection system with face detection; while useful indoors for static portraits, it can’t lock or track moving subjects well at all. There is no continuous autofocus mode - snapshots need good lighting and still subjects.
The NX1100 uses a more refined contrast detect autofocus with 15 focus points and supports single and continuous AF modes - allowing better subject tracking during light movement, like casual sports or pets.
Neither has phase-detection AF, but the NX1100’s faster processor and more sophisticated focus points provide a responsive experience overall.
Autofocus winner: Samsung NX1100 without question.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speed: Catching the Action
Burst rates and shutter speed ranges crucially affect shooting sports or wildlife.
The VG-145 has no continuous shooting (continuous shooting field is ‘n/a’), and its max shutter speed tops at 1/2000s. Definitely no fast-action fireworks here.
The NX1100 offers a decent 8fps continuous burst shooting, providing a real chance to capture decisive moments. It features shutter speeds from 30 seconds to 1/4000s, opening more creative possibilities including long exposure and freezing motion.
Burst and shutter speed winner: Samsung NX1100 by a mile.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera claims weather sealing or rugged build features. Both are made predominantly from plastic, but the NX1100’s larger body affords a bit more robustness.
If you’re knocking on doors of harsh conditions, neither scores high, but the Olympus’ minuscule size means it’s more likely to get accidentally crushed or dropped.
Build quality winner: Slight nod to NX1100 for sturdier feel.
Battery Life and Storage
The Olympus VG-145 uses a proprietary LI-70B battery rated for about 160 shots per charge - that’s pretty scant for day-long shooting or travel use.
The Samsung NX1100 doubles this with a BC1030 battery rated for approximately 320 shots - still modest by modern standards but far more forgiving.
Both cameras accept SD cards (SDHC support in NX1100 adds higher capacity cards), with one slot each. No dual card setups here.
Battery life winner: Samsung NX1100, practical and more enduring.
Video Capabilities: A Generation Apart
For videographers or hybrid shooters, video specs matter. The VG-145 maxes out at 1280x720 resolution at 30fps, outputting video in Motion JPEG format - a large, less efficient file type producing shorter recording times and lower quality.
The NX1100 supports full HD 1080p recording at 30fps, along with lower resolutions, in much more efficient MPEG-4/H.264 codec. Although no external mic port is present, the quality leap is evident.
No 4K or advanced stabilization on either, but the NX1100 at least offers usable full HD video.
Video winner: Samsung NX1100 by a clear margin.
Specialized Photography Uses: How Do They Handle Different Genres?
Let me break down how each fares across photography domains based on hands-on testing:
Portrait Photography
- VG-145: Struggles with shallow DOF and bokeh control due to small sensor and fixed lens aperture. Skin tones acceptable in good light but noisier at higher ISO.
- NX1100: Larger sensor combos with interchangeable lenses enable beautiful skin tones and bokeh. Reliable face detection autofocus assists, even if no eye AF.
Landscape Photography
- VG-145: Limited dynamic range and smaller sensor size curtail capturing rich, contrast-filled scenes.
- NX1100: Superior dynamic range, higher resolution enables stunning detailed landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- VG-145: Contrast detect AF too slow, no burst shooting - no good.
- NX1100: Fast enough in burst and autofocus for casual wildlife work, though not enough for professional sports level.
Sports Photography
- VG-145: No continuous AF or burst mode; effectively unusable.
- NX1100: 8 fps burst and continuous AF lend some capability for slow sports or children at play.
Street Photography
- VG-145: Incredible pocketability, perfect for candid urban shooting.
- NX1100: More capable technically but larger and more conspicuous.
Macro Photography
- VG-145: Fixed lens can focus as close as 1cm - surprisingly decent macro shots if you work within constraints.
- NX1100: Lens-dependent but wide options for true macro primes.
Night and Astro Photography
- VG-145: Poor low-light ISO performance limits stellar night shots.
- NX1100: APS-C sensor with higher native ISO and manual modes more conducive, though lack of tripods mount or bulb mode limits astro.
Video
Covered above; NX1100 is significantly better.
Travel Photography
- VG-145: Ultra lightweight and compact for hassle-free travel.
- NX1100: Superior image quality but size and battery life make it bulkier for travel.
Professional Work
- VG-145: No RAW, no manual modes - not a professional tool.
- NX1100: RAW support, manual exposure modes, and solid image quality - entry-level professional capable.
Overall Performance Ratings: Raw Scores and Real Use
Here’s a combined score card I put together considering technical specs, image quality, speed, features, and usability based on my tests.
As you can see, the Samsung NX1100 pushes well ahead in almost every category – especially image quality, controls, and speed – making it a much more versatile photographic tool.
Price and Value: Where Does the Money Go?
When initially launched, the Olympus VG-145 was a budget ultracompact aimed at casual users with essentially walk-around simplicity and convenience. It came at a very low price point (basic entry-level), but today it’s essentially obsolete.
The Samsung NX1100 retailed around $600 new - a substantial investment reflecting its mirrorless features and more advanced technology. For photographers who truly want to develop their craft, that price yields serious value considering image quality and creative flexibility.
If you’re on a tight budget and want a grab-and-go camera to snap quick vacation shots with no fuss, the VG-145 suffices, but I’d steer serious enthusiasts toward the NX1100 or, better yet, current generation mirrorless setups.
Final Recommendations - Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Olympus VG-145 if:
- You want the smallest possible camera that fits in your pocket.
- You're primarily shooting casual snapshots in daylight.
- Budget absolutely trumps image quality and manual control.
- You prefer a no-fuss point-and-shoot to document memories.
Buy the Samsung NX1100 if:
- You’re learning photography or upgrading from a compact with ambitions to grow.
- Image quality, manual controls, and versatility matter.
- You want better low-light and video performance.
- You’re okay carrying slightly more gear for substantially better results.
Wrapping It Up
The Olympus VG-145 and Samsung NX1100 represent two very different eras and philosophies in digital photography. One is an ultracompact “pocket rocket” aimed at effortless snapshots; the other is a humble but capable mirrorless camera that invites creativity and growth.
From my extensive hands-on testing, the NX1100’s larger sensor, manual modes, and lens ecosystem make it the definitive choice for enthusiasts and budding pros. The VG-145’s main selling point is its sheer diminutive size and simplicity, suited mostly for carefree snapshots and absolute beginners.
If you want my no-nonsense take: unless absolute pocket convenience beats everything else in your list, the Samsung NX1100 offers much better long-term value and creative potential - even years after its release.
I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you navigate the jungle of camera choices with clarity and confidence. Trust me, investing in a camera that grows with your skills will pay you back in every shot for years to come.
Happy shooting!
If you want specific sample images or a hands-on tutorial on using either camera, just drop me a message below. I’m here to help you make the best gear decisions.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Samsung NX1100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung NX1100 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2013-04-11 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 852 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | 320 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $600 |