Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right compact camera can be daunting, especially with a varied market that offers models tailored to different genres, skill levels, and budgets. Today, we're putting two small sensor compacts head-to-head: the Olympus VG-160 and the Ricoh GR Digital III. Both aimed at enthusiasts seeking portability, decent image quality, and practical features - but at very different price points and with distinct strengths.

Drawing from our extensive experience testing thousands of cameras over 15 years, we'll guide you through the technical specs, real-world performance, and which model fits your photography ambitions best. Whether you're into street photography, landscapes, or casual snapshots, this detailed breakdown will help you make an informed choice.

Unboxing the Basics: Design, Size, and Build

When it comes to carry-and-go convenience, size and ergonomics matter. The Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital III differ in footprint, thickness, and handling philosophy.

Feature Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR Digital III
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19 mm 109 x 59 x 26 mm
Weight 125 g 208 g
Build Material Plastic compact body Robust metal alloy body
Weather Sealing No No
Lens Fixed 26-130mm equiv. (5x zoom) Fixed 28mm equiv. prime
Grip Minimal Minimal but solid feel

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

The VG-160 is clearly the smaller and lighter of the two, making it an ultra-portable option. Its slim form factor makes it easy to slip into any pocket or purse. However, this comes with trade-offs - thin construction and plastic materials tend to compromise grip comfort and durability in active shooting conditions.

By contrast, the Ricoh GR Digital III, while heavier and thicker, offers a more substantial, premium feel. Its metal chassis inspires confidence for daily carry and more rigorous use. The prime lens design keeps front-end bulk minimal, and the body is shaped thoughtfully for a steady grip despite modest dimensions.

Which is better? If size and budget are your top priorities, the VG-160 wins in sheer convenience. But if handling confidence and tactile quality matter for extended use, GR Digital III comes ahead.

Top-Down: Control Layout and User Interface

A camera’s external controls and interface impact how swiftly and intuitively you can compose shots and tweak settings on the fly - critical for candid, street, or event photography.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

  • Olympus VG-160 relies heavily on menu-driven functions with very limited physical controls. You get a modest array of buttons but no dedicated dials for exposure or mode selection.
  • Ricoh GR Digital III sports traditional PASM mode dials, shutter speed and aperture rings, and well-placed buttons optimized for rapid adjustments. This makes it more appealing to those who prefer manual control for creativity.

The GR Digital III’s interface is a huge gain for photographers who like to rule over every shot’s exposure; the VG-160 suits more casual shooters who prioritize simplicity.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Cameras

Though both cameras have small sensors, the differences here critically shape image output quality.

Specification Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR Digital III
Sensor size 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm)
Sensor type CCD CCD
Resolution 14 MP 10 MP
Anti-aliasing Filter Yes Yes
ISO Range 80–1600 64–1600
RAW Support No Yes

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

The sensor on the Ricoh GR Digital III is noticeably larger - approximately 1.5x the surface area of the Olympus. This jump translates into several practical advantages:

  • Better low-light performance: The larger photosites on the GR’s 1/1.7” chip capture more light, reducing noise at higher ISO settings.
  • Greater dynamic range: You’ll see improved detail retention in highlights and shadows during landscape or bright daylight shooting.
  • RAW file capture: The GR supports RAW, letting you fine-tune exposure, white balance, and noise reduction during post-processing - important for serious photographers. The VG-160 shoots only JPEG, limiting editing latitude.

Despite having more pixels, the VG-160’s smaller sensor tends to produce noisier images and weak dynamic range, especially beyond ISO 400.

Viewing Your Shots: Screens and Viewfinders

How you frame and review your shots impacts workflow efficiency.

Feature Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR Digital III
LCD Size 3" 3"
Resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Touchscreen No No
Built-in Viewfinder No Optional accessory optical viewfinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Ricoh GR Digital III features a significantly higher resolution LCD, making it easier to check focus sharpness and exposure on the rear screen. The Olympus’s 230k resolution screen feels blurry and less helpful for judging critical focus.

Neither camera offers a built-in electronic viewfinder, but the GR Digital III boasts an optional optical viewfinder accessory. This addition is highly prized by street and travel photographers to shoot discreetly in bright conditions or conserve battery life.

Autofocus and Focusing Flexibility

Both cams use contrast-detection AF systems, but the Ricoh has a slight edge for manual focus support:

  • Olympus VG-160: Autofocus only; no manual focus ring or focus peaking. Macro mode reachable at close focus but limited precision.
  • Ricoh GR Digital III: Manual focus ring on the lens, enabling fine tailoring of focus distance - a gem for macro, street, and creative photography. Accurate single-point AF; no face or eye detection.

Neither model excels in fast AF tracking or burst shooting capabilities, reflecting their era and class.

Real World Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres

Let’s break down performance and suitability across popular photography disciplines:

Portrait Photography

  • Ricoh GR Digital III offers a bright F1.9 fixed 28mm (~28mm equiv.) lens for pleasing subject isolation and nice bokeh, paired with manual focus control for precise eye sharpening.
  • Olympus VG-160 uses a smaller sensor and variable aperture F2.8-6.5 (26-130mm equiv zoom). While zoom range aids framing, smaller aperture at longer focal lengths limits bokeh quality. Face detection helps slightly but is basic.

Verdict: Ricoh’s combination delivers more pleasing portraits with better subject separation and creative control.

Landscape Photography

  • Bigger sensor area and RAW support give Ricoh the advantage for capturing rich detail and dynamic range in scenic shots.
  • Olympus can deliver usable JPEGs but lacks RAW latitude and dynamic range breadth.
  • Neither camera offers weather sealing - be cautious shooting outdoors.
  • Zoom on Olympus is useful for framing landscapes compositionally.

Street and Travel Photography

The Olympus VG-160’s compact size favors travelers wanting low profile cameras, but Ricoh’s faster aperture, manual controls, and optional viewfinder empower street shooters who want creative freedom and control.

Battery life is limited on both, but the VG-160 slightly edges out with around 165 shots per charge. Ricoh’s data is less defined but typically less due to power-hungry processors.

Wildlife and Sports

Neither camera is ideal here: slow autofocus, no burst modes, and lack of image stabilization holds back action capture.

Macro Photography

Ricoh’s 1cm macro range and manual focus ring enable close-up work with precision. Olympus’s macro minimum focus at 7cm and no manual focus limit utility.

Night and Astro Photography

The larger sensor and ISO 64 base on the Ricoh GR Digital III allow you've cleaner low-light capture. Olympus tops out at ISO 1600 but noise rises quickly.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras only offer basic video in low resolutions:

Feature Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR Digital III
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 640 x 480 @ 30 fps
Formats Motion JPEG Standard MJPEG
Audio Input No No
Stabilization No No

Neither will satisfy serious video users.

Lens and Accessory Ecosystem

  • Olympus VG-160 has a fixed zoom lens with no interchangeable lens potential or accessory mounting options.
  • Ricoh GR Digital III sports a high quality, sharp prime lens with manual focus. It accepts an optical viewfinder accessory and lens filters. This expands creative possibilities.

For photographers who want to experiment with different focal lengths or invest in accessories, Ricoh holds the advantage.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards and a single card slot.

  • VG-160 uses a proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion battery (LI-70B), rated for ~165 shots.
  • GR Digital III uses a different battery type, with estimates around 200 shots, but many users report shorter practical battery life due to power-hungry processor.

Always carry spare batteries and memory cards, especially when traveling.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither model offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS - expected given release dates.

USB 2.0 connectivity allows image transfer but no remote control or tethering.

Price vs Performance Analysis

  • Olympus VG-160 launched as an entry-level budget compact (~$90 new), excellent as a simple point-and-shoot for casual snaps or first cameras.
  • Ricoh GR Digital III priced higher (~$400 at launch), targeting enthusiasts wanting superior image quality and manual control in a pocketable body.

This gap reflects the significant sensor and control improvements.

Sample Image Comparisons and Ratings

We tested both cameras side by side in typical shooting conditions. Here are selected samples showcasing strengths and weaknesses in color fidelity, detail, and noise.

  • VG-160 images show decent color but softness and grain past ISO 400.
  • GR Digital III photos exhibit sharper detail, richer tones, and better low light clarity.

Below is an aggregated score summary based on image quality, usability, build, and value.

Who Should Choose Which?

Go with the Olympus VG-160 if:

  • You want an ultra-budget camera primarily for casual everyday shooting.
  • Portability and simple operation trump manual control.
  • Video light use at HD 720p suffices.
  • You’re gifting a first camera or want a small backup.

Opt for the Ricoh GR Digital III if:

  • You crave manual exposure control and precision focusing.
  • Low light shooting and image quality matter.
  • You appreciate a fast prime lens with beautiful bokeh.
  • You’re passionate about street, travel, and macro photography.
  • RAW image capture is a must for editing flexibility.

Final Thoughts

Both the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital III demonstrate core small sensor compact strengths in portability and ease but diverge strongly in feature depth and image fidelity. The VG-160 is a practical, budget-friendly option ideal for casual shooters, while the Ricoh GR Digital III offers a compact powerhouse for photographers who want creative control and superior image results.

If you’re a beginner or want a lightweight, grab-and-go point-and-shoot for family snapshots, the Olympus fits nicely. But if you aspire to take your photography further in quality and precision, the Ricoh GR Digital III remains a worthy investment, especially considering its classic status among enthusiasts.

Getting Started

To get hands-on with either model, check out used or refurbished options online or at local camera stores. Don’t forget to explore compatible accessories like viewfinders or filters for the Ricoh GR Digital III, which can greatly expand your creative options.

Your Creative Path Awaits

Whatever your choice, experimenting with these cameras will grow your skills and visual storytelling. Small sensor compacts may no longer be at photography’s cutting edge, but their blend of convenience and craftsmanship still has much to offer.

Go ahead - grab one. Step outside, and capture your world.

For more expert camera comparisons and photography tips, keep following our hands-on reviews and guides. Happy shooting!

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus VG-160Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VG-160 Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2009-07-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lbs) 208 grams (0.46 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $90 $399