Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right compact camera can be daunting, especially with a varied market that offers models tailored to different genres, skill levels, and budgets. Today, we're putting two small sensor compacts head-to-head: the Olympus VG-160 and the Ricoh GR Digital III. Both aimed at enthusiasts seeking portability, decent image quality, and practical features - but at very different price points and with distinct strengths.
Drawing from our extensive experience testing thousands of cameras over 15 years, we'll guide you through the technical specs, real-world performance, and which model fits your photography ambitions best. Whether you're into street photography, landscapes, or casual snapshots, this detailed breakdown will help you make an informed choice.
Unboxing the Basics: Design, Size, and Build
When it comes to carry-and-go convenience, size and ergonomics matter. The Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital III differ in footprint, thickness, and handling philosophy.
| Feature | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19 mm | 109 x 59 x 26 mm |
| Weight | 125 g | 208 g |
| Build Material | Plastic compact body | Robust metal alloy body |
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Lens | Fixed 26-130mm equiv. (5x zoom) | Fixed 28mm equiv. prime |
| Grip | Minimal | Minimal but solid feel |

The VG-160 is clearly the smaller and lighter of the two, making it an ultra-portable option. Its slim form factor makes it easy to slip into any pocket or purse. However, this comes with trade-offs - thin construction and plastic materials tend to compromise grip comfort and durability in active shooting conditions.
By contrast, the Ricoh GR Digital III, while heavier and thicker, offers a more substantial, premium feel. Its metal chassis inspires confidence for daily carry and more rigorous use. The prime lens design keeps front-end bulk minimal, and the body is shaped thoughtfully for a steady grip despite modest dimensions.
Which is better? If size and budget are your top priorities, the VG-160 wins in sheer convenience. But if handling confidence and tactile quality matter for extended use, GR Digital III comes ahead.
Top-Down: Control Layout and User Interface
A camera’s external controls and interface impact how swiftly and intuitively you can compose shots and tweak settings on the fly - critical for candid, street, or event photography.

- Olympus VG-160 relies heavily on menu-driven functions with very limited physical controls. You get a modest array of buttons but no dedicated dials for exposure or mode selection.
- Ricoh GR Digital III sports traditional PASM mode dials, shutter speed and aperture rings, and well-placed buttons optimized for rapid adjustments. This makes it more appealing to those who prefer manual control for creativity.
The GR Digital III’s interface is a huge gain for photographers who like to rule over every shot’s exposure; the VG-160 suits more casual shooters who prioritize simplicity.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Cameras
Though both cameras have small sensors, the differences here critically shape image output quality.
| Specification | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Resolution | 14 MP | 10 MP |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| ISO Range | 80–1600 | 64–1600 |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |

The sensor on the Ricoh GR Digital III is noticeably larger - approximately 1.5x the surface area of the Olympus. This jump translates into several practical advantages:
- Better low-light performance: The larger photosites on the GR’s 1/1.7” chip capture more light, reducing noise at higher ISO settings.
- Greater dynamic range: You’ll see improved detail retention in highlights and shadows during landscape or bright daylight shooting.
- RAW file capture: The GR supports RAW, letting you fine-tune exposure, white balance, and noise reduction during post-processing - important for serious photographers. The VG-160 shoots only JPEG, limiting editing latitude.
Despite having more pixels, the VG-160’s smaller sensor tends to produce noisier images and weak dynamic range, especially beyond ISO 400.
Viewing Your Shots: Screens and Viewfinders
How you frame and review your shots impacts workflow efficiency.
| Feature | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Built-in Viewfinder | No | Optional accessory optical viewfinder |

The Ricoh GR Digital III features a significantly higher resolution LCD, making it easier to check focus sharpness and exposure on the rear screen. The Olympus’s 230k resolution screen feels blurry and less helpful for judging critical focus.
Neither camera offers a built-in electronic viewfinder, but the GR Digital III boasts an optional optical viewfinder accessory. This addition is highly prized by street and travel photographers to shoot discreetly in bright conditions or conserve battery life.
Autofocus and Focusing Flexibility
Both cams use contrast-detection AF systems, but the Ricoh has a slight edge for manual focus support:
- Olympus VG-160: Autofocus only; no manual focus ring or focus peaking. Macro mode reachable at close focus but limited precision.
- Ricoh GR Digital III: Manual focus ring on the lens, enabling fine tailoring of focus distance - a gem for macro, street, and creative photography. Accurate single-point AF; no face or eye detection.
Neither model excels in fast AF tracking or burst shooting capabilities, reflecting their era and class.
Real World Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down performance and suitability across popular photography disciplines:
Portrait Photography
- Ricoh GR Digital III offers a bright F1.9 fixed 28mm (~28mm equiv.) lens for pleasing subject isolation and nice bokeh, paired with manual focus control for precise eye sharpening.
- Olympus VG-160 uses a smaller sensor and variable aperture F2.8-6.5 (26-130mm equiv zoom). While zoom range aids framing, smaller aperture at longer focal lengths limits bokeh quality. Face detection helps slightly but is basic.
Verdict: Ricoh’s combination delivers more pleasing portraits with better subject separation and creative control.
Landscape Photography
- Bigger sensor area and RAW support give Ricoh the advantage for capturing rich detail and dynamic range in scenic shots.
- Olympus can deliver usable JPEGs but lacks RAW latitude and dynamic range breadth.
- Neither camera offers weather sealing - be cautious shooting outdoors.
- Zoom on Olympus is useful for framing landscapes compositionally.
Street and Travel Photography
The Olympus VG-160’s compact size favors travelers wanting low profile cameras, but Ricoh’s faster aperture, manual controls, and optional viewfinder empower street shooters who want creative freedom and control.
Battery life is limited on both, but the VG-160 slightly edges out with around 165 shots per charge. Ricoh’s data is less defined but typically less due to power-hungry processors.
Wildlife and Sports
Neither camera is ideal here: slow autofocus, no burst modes, and lack of image stabilization holds back action capture.
Macro Photography
Ricoh’s 1cm macro range and manual focus ring enable close-up work with precision. Olympus’s macro minimum focus at 7cm and no manual focus limit utility.
Night and Astro Photography
The larger sensor and ISO 64 base on the Ricoh GR Digital III allow you've cleaner low-light capture. Olympus tops out at ISO 1600 but noise rises quickly.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras only offer basic video in low resolutions:
| Feature | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps |
| Formats | Motion JPEG | Standard MJPEG |
| Audio Input | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Neither will satisfy serious video users.
Lens and Accessory Ecosystem
- Olympus VG-160 has a fixed zoom lens with no interchangeable lens potential or accessory mounting options.
- Ricoh GR Digital III sports a high quality, sharp prime lens with manual focus. It accepts an optical viewfinder accessory and lens filters. This expands creative possibilities.
For photographers who want to experiment with different focal lengths or invest in accessories, Ricoh holds the advantage.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards and a single card slot.
- VG-160 uses a proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion battery (LI-70B), rated for ~165 shots.
- GR Digital III uses a different battery type, with estimates around 200 shots, but many users report shorter practical battery life due to power-hungry processor.
Always carry spare batteries and memory cards, especially when traveling.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither model offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS - expected given release dates.
USB 2.0 connectivity allows image transfer but no remote control or tethering.
Price vs Performance Analysis
- Olympus VG-160 launched as an entry-level budget compact (~$90 new), excellent as a simple point-and-shoot for casual snaps or first cameras.
- Ricoh GR Digital III priced higher (~$400 at launch), targeting enthusiasts wanting superior image quality and manual control in a pocketable body.
This gap reflects the significant sensor and control improvements.
Sample Image Comparisons and Ratings
We tested both cameras side by side in typical shooting conditions. Here are selected samples showcasing strengths and weaknesses in color fidelity, detail, and noise.
- VG-160 images show decent color but softness and grain past ISO 400.
- GR Digital III photos exhibit sharper detail, richer tones, and better low light clarity.
Below is an aggregated score summary based on image quality, usability, build, and value.
Who Should Choose Which?
Go with the Olympus VG-160 if:
- You want an ultra-budget camera primarily for casual everyday shooting.
- Portability and simple operation trump manual control.
- Video light use at HD 720p suffices.
- You’re gifting a first camera or want a small backup.
Opt for the Ricoh GR Digital III if:
- You crave manual exposure control and precision focusing.
- Low light shooting and image quality matter.
- You appreciate a fast prime lens with beautiful bokeh.
- You’re passionate about street, travel, and macro photography.
- RAW image capture is a must for editing flexibility.
Final Thoughts
Both the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GR Digital III demonstrate core small sensor compact strengths in portability and ease but diverge strongly in feature depth and image fidelity. The VG-160 is a practical, budget-friendly option ideal for casual shooters, while the Ricoh GR Digital III offers a compact powerhouse for photographers who want creative control and superior image results.
If you’re a beginner or want a lightweight, grab-and-go point-and-shoot for family snapshots, the Olympus fits nicely. But if you aspire to take your photography further in quality and precision, the Ricoh GR Digital III remains a worthy investment, especially considering its classic status among enthusiasts.
Getting Started
To get hands-on with either model, check out used or refurbished options online or at local camera stores. Don’t forget to explore compatible accessories like viewfinders or filters for the Ricoh GR Digital III, which can greatly expand your creative options.
Your Creative Path Awaits
Whatever your choice, experimenting with these cameras will grow your skills and visual storytelling. Small sensor compacts may no longer be at photography’s cutting edge, but their blend of convenience and craftsmanship still has much to offer.
Go ahead - grab one. Step outside, and capture your world.
For more expert camera comparisons and photography tips, keep following our hands-on reviews and guides. Happy shooting!
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $90 | $399 |