Olympus VH-410 vs Sony RX10 II
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37


58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX10
- Later Model is Sony RX10 III

Olympus VH-410 vs Sony RX10 II: A Hands-On, Full-Spectrum Camera Shootout
When it comes to choosing a camera, photographers face a dizzying array of models that vary wildly in size, sensor capabilities, lens versatility, and even price tags. Today, we're pitting two very different beasts head-to-head - the modest Olympus VH-410, a no-frills compact zoom, against the powerhouse Sony RX10 II, a bridge camera that borders on professional territory. Both announced around the last decade or so, yet targeting vastly different users, these cameras provide a fascinating contrast in design philosophy, capability, and real-world performance.
After extensive hands-on time with both - shooting portraits, chasing wildlife, capturing landscapes, and even indulging in some video footage - I’m here to demystify which camera shines in what scenarios, and more importantly, where each will disappoint you. Whether you’re looking for an ultra-light travel companion or a robust superzoom with professional ambitions, one of these two will likely be on your shortlist. Let’s dive in.
Size and Handling: Pocketable vs Punchy
The first impression when holding these cameras side-by-side is like comparing a nimble sparrow to a hefty hawk.
The Olympus VH-410 is feather-light and pocket-friendly. Weighing in at a mere 152 grams and measuring just 102 x 60 x 21 mm, it slips into a jacket pocket with ease. Its compactness makes it perfect for casual shooters or travelers who want something that doesn’t scream “expensive equipment” (and won’t weigh you down on long hikes). Its fixed lens extends modestly from a solid but basic compact body.
In contrast, the Sony RX10 II demands respect - and a firm grip. This camera tips the scales at 813 grams (that’s more than five times heavier!) and measures a substantial 129 x 88 x 102 mm. Its SLR-style body and rubberized grip are designed for handling precision, with plenty of physical controls. This is no pocket camera, but a serious tool for those who want to ditch DSLR-plus-lens combos but still retain robust ergonomics.
Looking at the top view comparison, the RX10 II's control layout screams “professional” with dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and a comfortable mode dial, whereas the Olympus VH-410 has a minimalistic approach - mostly relying on menus and limited physical buttons, typical of small compacts.
Bottom line: If portability and stealth are your main criteria - say, street photography or travel where every gram counts - the Olympus VH-410 takes the prize. But if you want hands-on control and presence, the RX10 II feels like the tool a seasoned photographer expects.
Sensor and Image Quality: Tiny CCD vs Large BSI-CMOS
Under the hood lies a fundamental split in imaging philosophy.
The Olympus VH-410 uses a small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an area of about 28.07 mm². Its resolution clocked in at a modest 16 Megapixels, with an anti-aliasing filter in place. Its native ISO tops out at 1600, and there is no RAW support - meaning your creative control will be swamped by the camera’s internal JPEG processing. The CCD sensor tends to deliver punchy colors and decent details in good light but falls short when the action gets darker.
The RX10 II ups the ante significantly with a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm, 116.16 mm² area), providing 20 Megapixels with an anti-alias filter as well. Thanks to its higher-grade sensor and more advanced BIONZ X processor, this camera offers an extended ISO range up to 12,800 native (boosted to 25,600 for when you need to embrace noise). Importantly, it supports RAW capture and features a much wider dynamic range - measured at 12.6 EV by DxOMark.
Visually, this means the RX10 II delivers cleaner images, better color depth (23-bit color depth), and significantly improved low-light capabilities.
Having personally shot portraits and landscapes in various lighting situations with these cameras, I saw the RX10 II produce impressively detailed images with accurate skin tones, smooth highlight roll-off, and minimal noise at ISO 1600 - levels where the Olympus VH-410’s images got softer, noisier, and less reliable in color.
Conclusion: The RX10 II’s sensor is in a different league - enabling professional workflows - while the Olympus VH-410’s is a satisfactory entry-level sensor that performs best in bright, well-lit conditions.
Build, Weather Sealing, and Ergonomics
On the durability front, the RX10 II is the clear victor - boasting magnesium alloy construction and environmental sealing. This means it can shrug off dust and light rain, critical for outdoor enthusiasts and adventurous shooters bustling through unpredictable conditions. Olympus’s compact, while sturdy in its own right, offers no weatherproofing, making it a delicate companion best kept indoors or shielded from the elements.
The RX10’s physical controls, including a tilting LCD, electronic viewfinder with 2.4-million-dot resolution, and a top screen, provide multiple ways to interact, accommodating shooting in bright sun or awkward angles. Conversely, the VH-410 offers a fixed, relatively low-resolution 3-inch touchscreen LCD without an EVF.
I found the RX10 II’s tilting screen invaluable for low-angle macro shots or overhead crowd scenes, while the Olympus screen sufficed but rarely inspired. The lack of viewfinder also limits precise composition in bright environments on the VH-410.
Autofocus and Burst Speed: Hunting the Moving Subject
The Olympus VH-410 leans on a contrast-detection AF system with basic face detection but lacks phase detection or advanced tracking features. AF speed maxes out at about 2 frames per second in continuous mode, and there’s no manual focus option - which can frustrate precise focus control or advanced shooting techniques.
By contrast, the RX10 II pushes features to the max with 25 AF points, including face detection, and continuous autofocus with tracking. Its hybrid contrast/phase detection AF improves accuracy and speed. And with a burst shooting rate of 14 fps, it’s designed to capture fast-moving subjects - wildlife, sports, or street scenes where decoys abound.
This technical superiority directly impacts usage: I tested both cameras tracking moving birds and skateboarders - and while the VH-410 tended to hunt and miss focus often, the RX10 II nailed sharp shots in sequence with remarkable reliability.
Lens Versatility and Optical Performance
Both sport fixed superzoom lenses, but their specs reveal subtle differences.
The Olympus VH-410 offers a 5x zoom from 26 to 130 mm equivalent (in 35mm terms) with apertures ranging F2.8 at wide end down to F6.5 at telephoto. Its macro mode allows close focusing down to 5 cm, but the lens’s small size restricts its optical quality.
The RX10 II sports a premium 24-200 mm F2.8 constant aperture Zeiss-branded zoom - a rarity in fixed-lens cameras. This lens offers superior sharpness throughout the zoom range, fast max aperture enabling shallow depth of field and better low light performance, and close focus down to an impressive 3 cm.
From my shooting perspective, the RX10 II lens is significantly sharper corner-to-corner, creates more pleasing bokeh, and offers more creative flexibility for portrait and macro work alike. The Olympus lens suffices for casual snapshots but struggles to hold up to critical scrutiny, especially at longer focal lengths.
Photography Discipline Deep-Dive
Let's break down how each camera suits different photography genres, reflecting both specifications and real-world testing.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
The RX10 II offers robust eye-detection autofocus, fast AF, and better sensor performance for smooth skin tones and clean background separation thanks to its F2.8 constant aperture. I found it an excellent tool for environmental portraits and casual studio work.
The VH-410, while offering face detection, has limited depth-of-field control (thanks to smaller sensor and slower telephoto apertures), resulting in flatter images and less satisfying bokeh. Skin tones tended to be harsher and noisier in indoor or low-light situations.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
The RX10 II’s greater dynamic range and raw shooting capability allow for much more latitude in post-processing HDR edits and shadow recovery. Its 20 MP sensor delivers crisp details and vibrant colors.
The Olympus VH-410’s 16 MP images look fine on prints up to 8x10 inches, but less so when pushed - with poor dynamic range and noise creeping into shadow areas. The lack of weather sealing and narrower zoom also limit outdoor landscape use to fair-weather casual shooting.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rates
The RX10 II’s fast, continuous autofocus at 14 fps turns it into a convincing wildlife camera for mid-range telephoto shots. The Olympus VH-410’s slow 2 fps burst and hunting AF system struggle with fast action or unpredictable subjects.
Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness and Portability
The VH-410 is a nimble travel buddy - small enough to be discreet and light enough for all-day shooting. The RX10 II’s bulk and loud zoom drive (it’s not silent) make candid street shooting trickier, although its controls and EVF offer better framing.
Battery life also favors the Sony (400 shots vs Olympus’s unspecified but undoubtedly much lower count) - a serious factor for long excursions.
Macro and Close-Up
The Sony RX10 II’s 3 cm minimum focus distance and F2.8 aperture combined with image stabilization make it superb for handheld macro shots with great bokeh. The Olympus can do closeups at 5 cm but lacks focus precision and lens speed to get creative.
Night and Astro Photography
The RX10 II's larger sensor and better ISO performance make it capable under dim conditions and even astrophotography when paired with a tripod. The VH-410’s small sensor throws in the towel beyond ISO 400 to 800.
Video Capabilities: From Casual to Pro
The Olympus VH-410 offers modest HD (720p) video at 30 fps with basic MPEG motion JPEG compression. No external mic port, no 4K, no stabilization beyond sensor-shift means video quality is limited and suited only for casual clips.
In sharp contrast, the Sony RX10 II supports 4K UHD video (3840x2160p) at 30 fps leveraging XAVC S codec - a serious step for content creators aspiring for professional video quality. It includes optical image stabilization and microphone/headphone jacks for audio monitoring, making it a hybrid powerhouse for both stills and video.
Connectivity and Storage
The Olympus VH-410 comes with Eye-Fi wireless card support but no Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. It offers USB 2.0 with no HDMI or external microphone ports. Storage relies on a single SD card.
The RX10 II integrates built-in Wi-Fi plus NFC for quick smartphones pairing, USB 2.0, full-size HDMI out, and accepts Memory Sticks alongside SD cards, catering to demanding professional workflows.
Price and Value: What’s Your Budget Bought?
At launch, the Olympus VH-410 retailed around $186, marking it firmly in the budget compact segment - perfect for beginners or those needing a pocket camera for occasional snapshots.
The Sony RX10 II went for around $998 - closer to the entry level of professional bridge cameras, justified by its vast feature set and image quality.
Given these scores and assessments, consider your intended usage. The VH-410 is an affordable, portable companion for simple photography but limited in high-demand scenarios. The RX10 II is a versatile all-rounder, an excellent travel or event camera for serious enthusiasts willing to invest.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choosing between these two is not just a matter of specs but priorities:
-
Choose the Olympus VH-410 if:
- You want a lightweight, pocketable camera for casual travel or everyday snapshots.
- You’re on a tight budget but want a reliable zoom compact.
- You value simplicity over manual controls or raw file flexibility.
-
Choose the Sony RX10 II if:
- You need top-tier image quality in a fixed-lens camera, with excellent low-light and fast autofocus.
- You shoot diverse genres from portraits to wildlife and demand video capability with professional features.
- You don’t mind the weight and size in exchange for build quality and direct control.
In my extensive testing, I found these two cameras represent entirely different photography philosophies. The VH-410 is a humble, unassuming pocket tool ideal for snapshots and beginners. The RX10 II shines as a do-it-all superzoom for enthusiasts and pros who want stellar image quality, speed, and video in one box. Neither is “better” outright - but Ambos offer unique pathways depending on your photographic adventure.
Hope this deep dive helps you make a confident, experience-backed choice - and remember, the best camera is always the one you have with you and know how to use.
Happy shooting!
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-08-21 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 813 grams (1.79 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $186 | $998 |