Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with different sensor dimensions.

The VR-320 was announced 2 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the VR-320 scores vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
VR-320 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus VR-320
GR Digital III | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital III
VR-320 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-320 compared to the GR Digital III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and GR Digital III is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and GR Digital III.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $179 | $399 |