Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-330 was announced around the same time to the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VR-330 matches up vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus XZ-1
| VR-330 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VR-330
| XZ-1 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-1
| VR-330 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 and the XZ-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and XZ-1.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VR-330 will produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $220 | $567 |