Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-330 was announced around the same time to the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VR-330 matches up vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus XZ-1
| VR-330 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VR-330
| XZ-1 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-1
| VR-330 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 and the XZ-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and XZ-1.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VR-330 will produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $220 | $567 |
