Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-481mm (F) lens
  • 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The VR-330 was released 18 months before the Galaxy Camera 3G which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VR-330 scores versus the Galaxy Camera 3G in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

 VR-330 Galaxy Camera 3G 
Screen resolution460k0kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Olympus VR-330

 Galaxy Camera 3G VR-330 
RevealedAugust 2012February 2011Newer by 18 months
Screen size4.8"3"Bigger screen (+1.8")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

 VR-330 Galaxy Camera 3G 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 has physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Check the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 versus the Galaxy Camera 3G.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and Galaxy Camera 3G.

To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Portrait photography information
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
30
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Street photography information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Street photography information
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Sports photography camera
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
45
amazing zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
72
lighter than competition in class (305g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
relatively wide (23mm)
great zoom (481mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Landscape photography information
42
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
47
relatively wide (23mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
big screen (4.8 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Vlogging camera
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
37
relatively wide (23mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing external mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
 Olympus VR-330Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VR-330 Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-02-08 2012-08-29
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III 1.4GHz Quad-Core
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 -
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 23-481mm (20.9x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 4.8"
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT Color LCD 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 pounds) 305 gr (0.67 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $220 $606