Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37


89 Imaging
53 Features
58 Overall
55
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Released June 2010
- Renewed by Sony NEX-5N

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5: A Hands-On Comparison for Real-World Photography
When it comes to picking your next camera, the choices can be overwhelming - especially across different categories like superzooms and mirrorless systems. Today, I’m diving deep into two very different but compelling cameras: the Olympus VR-330, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Sony NEX-5, an early mirrorless APS-C system. Both launched in the early 2010s, but are aimed at different audiences and offer vastly different image quality and flexibility.
After extensive hands-on testing and comparing thousands of cameras, here’s my straight-talking, in-the-field comparison to help you decide which might suit your photography style, budget, and aspirations.
Getting to Know the Cameras: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
First impressions matter, especially how a camera feels in hand and how intuitive its controls are during a busy shoot.
Olympus VR-330 is a classic compact superzoom - tiny, lightweight at just 158g, and pocket-friendly with dimensions roughly 101x58x29 mm. It has a fixed 24-300mm equivalent lens, which means you don’t have to carry extra glass. The ergonomics are simple, designed for casual use rather than clubs for thumbs enthusiasts. Controls are minimal with no manual exposure modes.
By contrast, the Sony NEX-5 is a small rangefinder-style mirrorless camera weighing about 287g (almost double the Olympus). It measures 111x59x38 mm – slightly bigger but still quite travel-friendly if you bring just one or two lenses. The NEX-5 offers a more tactile experience with buttons and dials, manual controls, and a Sony E-mount that opens up a huge world of lenses.
In real-world use, the VR-330’s fixed lens and straightforward interface make it a grab-and-go solution, but users sacrificing control for simplicity. The NEX-5, meanwhile, invites more experimentation, manual tweaking, and has a more rewarding handling experience once you get past its compact size.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor size and technology are the biggest differentiators here. Let me walk you through what this means for your pictures.
The Olympus VR-330 sports a smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm with 14 MP resolution. This sensor size is typical for point-and-shoot superzooms, excellent for high-zoom convenience but limited in dynamic range and low-light performance. The max ISO tops out at 1600; however, noise will be very noticeable beyond ISO 400 from my tests.
Sony NEX-5 boasts an APS-C sized CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6 mm), significantly larger with 14 MP resolution. This sensor yields cleaner images with better color depth (DxO color depth 22.2 vs untested but weaker on Olympus), excellent dynamic range, and superior low-light capability (ISO 200 to 12800 native range). This translates into richer details, smoother gradations, and much better ISO handling during dusk, indoor, and night shoots.
If you’re after image quality that seriously impresses - even if you want to print big or crop tight - the NEX-5’s sensor will deliver far more satisfying results.
LCD Screens and Live View Experience
Both cameras feature a 3-inch LCD screen, but their quality and functionality differ notably.
Olympus VR-330 opts for a fixed TFT LCD with 460K dots - adequate but not bright or sharp, impacting your ability to fine-tune focus or evaluate image detail during sunny days. Lack of touchscreen or tilting limits flexibility.
Sony NEX-5 upgrades the experience with a 3-inch tilting LCD at 920K dots, nearly doubling the pixel count for crisper previews. The tilt mechanism is great for shooting at awkward angles - low to the ground or overhead. However, no touchscreen here means you rely on buttons for focus point selection, which takes some practice.
For live view shooting and composing challenging scenes, the NEX-5’s screen offers a much more enjoyable and versatile user experience.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Here’s where the rubber meets the road - how quickly and accurately these cameras can capture fleeting moments.
Olympus VR-330’s autofocus relies solely on contrast detection, with basic multi-area AF and face detection. Unfortunately, it offers no continuous AF or manual focus options, limiting tracking of moving subjects such as in wildlife or sports scenarios. The fixed lens zoom mechanism is silent but relatively slow to refocus, and burst shooting is not supported - handy for landscapes but frustrating if you try to shoot anything fast.
Sony NEX-5 features a 25-point contrast-detected AF system with selective AF modes and continuous AF capability. While not blazing fast by today’s standards, this system was a huge leap forward in its segment at launch. It can track moderately moving subjects indoors and out, offers reliable accuracy, and pairs well with fast E-mount lenses. Continuous shooting at 7 fps fills a useful gap for amateur sports and wildlife photography. However, it lacks phase-detection AF and more advanced tracking algorithms found in newer models.
In day-to-day terms: for casual snapshots and travel, VR-330 is okay; for moving subjects and a bit of serious photography, the NEX-5 is the clear winner.
Lens Versatility - Fixed Zoom or Expandable System?
Lens options often define long-term usability of your camera more than the body.
Olympus VR-330 wins on convenience with its 24-300mm equivalent zoom lens built-in, covering wide to telephoto without changing lenses. The macro mode reaching as close as 1 cm is handy for casual close-ups. Of course, you’re stuck with F3.0-5.9 aperture range which limits low-light use and creative depth of field control.
Sony NEX-5’s Sony E-mount supports over 120 native lenses, spanning primes, zooms, and specialty optics. This extensibility accommodates any genre - from fast 50mm F1.8 primes for portraits to long telephotos for wildlife or sports. The APS-C sensor also benefits from better optical quality overall.
While the VR-330 is plug-and-play and cheapskate-friendly, the NEX-5 is a system you can grow into, investing in glass as your skills and needs evolve.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how both cameras handle popular styles and niches.
Portrait Photography
Sony NEX-5’s larger sensor produces smoother skin tones and better subject separation thanks to shallower depth of field capabilities with fast lenses. Eye-detection AF wasn’t available, but precise AF points help nail focus on eyes. Olympus VR-330’s smaller sensor and extended zoom let you shoot from far away but at the price of harsher skin rendering and noisy images in indoor lighting.
Landscape Photography
Both cameras capture decent detail in daylight, but NEX-5’s superior dynamic range lets you recover shadows and highlights more easily. Olympus lacks environmental sealing and sports limited resolution for enlargements. Sony’s stabilized lenses help more, though lens choice matters more here.
Wildlife and Sports
VR-330's sluggish autofocus and no burst shooting limit its use for action. The NEX-5 offers faster AF and continuous shooting up to 7fps. You can invest in fast telephoto glass for serious wildlife, though AF tracking isn’t professional grade.
Street Photography
VR-330’s compactness and silent zoom make it discreet and unobtrusive. Sony NEX-5 is small but more noticeable. However, its tilting screen allows creative angles on the street.
Macro Photography
VR-330 shines here with 1cm macro focus - exceptional for a compact. Sony needs a dedicated macro lens but offers better resolution and manual focus control.
Night and Astro Photography
Sony NEX-5’s high ISO capabilities and long shutter speeds dominate here. VR-330 maxes out at ISO 1600 with noisy results. Neither offers special astro modes, but long exposure on NEX-5 is easier with manual controls.
Video Capabilities
Sony NEX-5 supports full HD 1080p at 60fps in AVCHD, delivering excellent video quality for its era, albeit without mic input or stabilization in body. VR-330 records only up to 720p at 30fps in Motion JPEG - a basic implementation. For multimedia content creators, the Sony is far preferable.
Travel Photography
If you want an all-in-one solution with minimal gear, the VR-330’s compactness and superzoom trump the Sony system’s size and lens considerations. For travelers prioritizing image quality and flexibility, the NEX-5 offers more control albeit at the cost of carrying lenses.
Professional Workflows
Sony NEX-5 supports RAW files, manual exposures, custom white balance, exposure compensation, and tethered workflows (via third party). VR-330 shoots only JPEG and offers basic exposure modes - limiting professional usage.
Build Quality, Battery Life, and Storage
Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or freezeproofing - typical at their price points and era.
Battery-wise, Sony NEX-5’s NP-FW50 battery can deliver about 330 shots per charge, respectable for a mirrorless of its generation. VR-330 lacks official rating, but its small Li-ion battery provides around 200-300 shots realistically.
For storage, both accept SD/SDHC cards, but Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, adding some versatility.
Connectivity and Extras
It’s worth noting both cameras lack modern wireless connectivity (no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC). Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI out for basic tethering and viewing.
Neither supports external microphones or headphones, limiting video creators somewhat.
Price Considerations and Value
Listed around $220 new (ish) for VR-330 and about $600 for NEX-5, the price difference is considerable.
For absolute budget shooters wanting a pocket superzoom, Olympus VR-330 is a compelling choice. It does everything in one package without hassle but comes with predictable image quality compromises.
Sony NEX-5, despite its older age, still holds value for enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, manual control, and lens choice. The initial investment is higher, but this camera can grow with you.
Sample Image Comparison: Seeing Is Believing
To wrap up the technical chatter, here are hands-on sample images from both cameras under various conditions.
Look closely at skin texture, color fidelity, and noise in shadows - Sony’s APS-C sensor really outperforms the Olympus small sensor. Landscape shots show better tonal range and detail retention too.
Overall Performance Ratings
Here’s a quick summary scoring from image quality, autofocus, handling to value.
Sony NEX-5 dominates in almost every category except portability and convenience. Olympus VR-330 wins points for size, zoom reach, and ease of use.
Genre-Specific Scoring: Who Wins Where?
Here’s how each camera stacks up across different photography disciplines based on testing:
- Portrait & Landscape: Sony NEX-5 leads
- Wildlife & Sports: Sony by a mile
- Street & Travel: Depends - Olympus for size, Sony for quality
- Macro: Olympus for close-up capability, Sony for image detail
- Video: Sony clearly superior
- Night/Astro: Sony dominates
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Olympus VR-330
Pros:
- Small, lightweight, pocket-friendly
- Extensive 24-300mm equivalent zoom range
- Simple operation for casual shooters
- Competitive price point for superzoom compact
Cons:
- Small 1/2.3" sensor limits image quality
- No RAW or manual controls
- Limited video at 720p
- Slow autofocus and no burst mode
- No wireless connectivity; basic LCD
Sony NEX-5
Pros:
- Large APS-C sensor with superior image quality
- Interchangeable lens system with vast options
- Full manual exposure modes and RAW support
- 7 fps burst shooting and selective AF modes
- Full HD video at 1080p/60fps with AVCHD
- Tilting high-res LCD
Cons:
- Heavier and bulkier than small compacts
- No image stabilization in body (depends on lens)
- No touch screen or built-in flash
- No wireless features
- Higher initial price and lens investment needed
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
If you’re reading this as a photography enthusiast or professional hunting for your next capable camera, here’s the bottom line:
-
Choose the Olympus VR-330 if: you want an ultra-portable camera with an all-in-one zoom lens, value simplicity, and your photography leans toward casual travel and everyday snapshots without fuss. It’s ideal for beginners or those on a tight budget who care more about convenience than stellar image quality.
-
Choose the Sony NEX-5 if: image quality and creative control are priorities, you want to grow your skills, and are willing to invest in lenses. It’s great for portraits, landscapes, street photography, video, and even semi-pro work. Though older, its APS-C sensor and manual features hold their own today better than many similar-priced compact cameras.
Both cameras reflect their era well. Olympus is a trusty pocket superzoom; Sony a stepping stone into the wonderful world of mirrorless systems.
I hope this comparison has clarified the key strengths and compromises of each camera based on real hands-on experience. Choosing gear is always a balance - what matters most is matching the camera to your personal style and budget. Whichever you choose, happy shooting!
For any questions or detailed usage tips about either camera model, drop a comment or reach out on social photography forums - you’ll find plenty of enthusiasts eager to share insights and sample photos.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 287 grams (0.63 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 796 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $220 | $599 |