Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
58
Overall
55

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Sony NEX-5
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-5N
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5: A Hands-On Comparison for Real-World Photography

When it comes to picking your next camera, the choices can be overwhelming - especially across different categories like superzooms and mirrorless systems. Today, I’m diving deep into two very different but compelling cameras: the Olympus VR-330, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Sony NEX-5, an early mirrorless APS-C system. Both launched in the early 2010s, but are aimed at different audiences and offer vastly different image quality and flexibility.

After extensive hands-on testing and comparing thousands of cameras, here’s my straight-talking, in-the-field comparison to help you decide which might suit your photography style, budget, and aspirations.

Getting to Know the Cameras: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

First impressions matter, especially how a camera feels in hand and how intuitive its controls are during a busy shoot.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison

Olympus VR-330 is a classic compact superzoom - tiny, lightweight at just 158g, and pocket-friendly with dimensions roughly 101x58x29 mm. It has a fixed 24-300mm equivalent lens, which means you don’t have to carry extra glass. The ergonomics are simple, designed for casual use rather than clubs for thumbs enthusiasts. Controls are minimal with no manual exposure modes.

By contrast, the Sony NEX-5 is a small rangefinder-style mirrorless camera weighing about 287g (almost double the Olympus). It measures 111x59x38 mm – slightly bigger but still quite travel-friendly if you bring just one or two lenses. The NEX-5 offers a more tactile experience with buttons and dials, manual controls, and a Sony E-mount that opens up a huge world of lenses.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison

In real-world use, the VR-330’s fixed lens and straightforward interface make it a grab-and-go solution, but users sacrificing control for simplicity. The NEX-5, meanwhile, invites more experimentation, manual tweaking, and has a more rewarding handling experience once you get past its compact size.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Sensor size and technology are the biggest differentiators here. Let me walk you through what this means for your pictures.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison

The Olympus VR-330 sports a smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm with 14 MP resolution. This sensor size is typical for point-and-shoot superzooms, excellent for high-zoom convenience but limited in dynamic range and low-light performance. The max ISO tops out at 1600; however, noise will be very noticeable beyond ISO 400 from my tests.

Sony NEX-5 boasts an APS-C sized CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6 mm), significantly larger with 14 MP resolution. This sensor yields cleaner images with better color depth (DxO color depth 22.2 vs untested but weaker on Olympus), excellent dynamic range, and superior low-light capability (ISO 200 to 12800 native range). This translates into richer details, smoother gradations, and much better ISO handling during dusk, indoor, and night shoots.

If you’re after image quality that seriously impresses - even if you want to print big or crop tight - the NEX-5’s sensor will deliver far more satisfying results.

LCD Screens and Live View Experience

Both cameras feature a 3-inch LCD screen, but their quality and functionality differ notably.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Olympus VR-330 opts for a fixed TFT LCD with 460K dots - adequate but not bright or sharp, impacting your ability to fine-tune focus or evaluate image detail during sunny days. Lack of touchscreen or tilting limits flexibility.

Sony NEX-5 upgrades the experience with a 3-inch tilting LCD at 920K dots, nearly doubling the pixel count for crisper previews. The tilt mechanism is great for shooting at awkward angles - low to the ground or overhead. However, no touchscreen here means you rely on buttons for focus point selection, which takes some practice.

For live view shooting and composing challenging scenes, the NEX-5’s screen offers a much more enjoyable and versatile user experience.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance

Here’s where the rubber meets the road - how quickly and accurately these cameras can capture fleeting moments.

Olympus VR-330’s autofocus relies solely on contrast detection, with basic multi-area AF and face detection. Unfortunately, it offers no continuous AF or manual focus options, limiting tracking of moving subjects such as in wildlife or sports scenarios. The fixed lens zoom mechanism is silent but relatively slow to refocus, and burst shooting is not supported - handy for landscapes but frustrating if you try to shoot anything fast.

Sony NEX-5 features a 25-point contrast-detected AF system with selective AF modes and continuous AF capability. While not blazing fast by today’s standards, this system was a huge leap forward in its segment at launch. It can track moderately moving subjects indoors and out, offers reliable accuracy, and pairs well with fast E-mount lenses. Continuous shooting at 7 fps fills a useful gap for amateur sports and wildlife photography. However, it lacks phase-detection AF and more advanced tracking algorithms found in newer models.

In day-to-day terms: for casual snapshots and travel, VR-330 is okay; for moving subjects and a bit of serious photography, the NEX-5 is the clear winner.

Lens Versatility - Fixed Zoom or Expandable System?

Lens options often define long-term usability of your camera more than the body.

Olympus VR-330 wins on convenience with its 24-300mm equivalent zoom lens built-in, covering wide to telephoto without changing lenses. The macro mode reaching as close as 1 cm is handy for casual close-ups. Of course, you’re stuck with F3.0-5.9 aperture range which limits low-light use and creative depth of field control.

Sony NEX-5’s Sony E-mount supports over 120 native lenses, spanning primes, zooms, and specialty optics. This extensibility accommodates any genre - from fast 50mm F1.8 primes for portraits to long telephotos for wildlife or sports. The APS-C sensor also benefits from better optical quality overall.

While the VR-330 is plug-and-play and cheapskate-friendly, the NEX-5 is a system you can grow into, investing in glass as your skills and needs evolve.

Performance Across Photography Genres

Let’s break down how both cameras handle popular styles and niches.

Portrait Photography

Sony NEX-5’s larger sensor produces smoother skin tones and better subject separation thanks to shallower depth of field capabilities with fast lenses. Eye-detection AF wasn’t available, but precise AF points help nail focus on eyes. Olympus VR-330’s smaller sensor and extended zoom let you shoot from far away but at the price of harsher skin rendering and noisy images in indoor lighting.

Landscape Photography

Both cameras capture decent detail in daylight, but NEX-5’s superior dynamic range lets you recover shadows and highlights more easily. Olympus lacks environmental sealing and sports limited resolution for enlargements. Sony’s stabilized lenses help more, though lens choice matters more here.

Wildlife and Sports

VR-330's sluggish autofocus and no burst shooting limit its use for action. The NEX-5 offers faster AF and continuous shooting up to 7fps. You can invest in fast telephoto glass for serious wildlife, though AF tracking isn’t professional grade.

Street Photography

VR-330’s compactness and silent zoom make it discreet and unobtrusive. Sony NEX-5 is small but more noticeable. However, its tilting screen allows creative angles on the street.

Macro Photography

VR-330 shines here with 1cm macro focus - exceptional for a compact. Sony needs a dedicated macro lens but offers better resolution and manual focus control.

Night and Astro Photography

Sony NEX-5’s high ISO capabilities and long shutter speeds dominate here. VR-330 maxes out at ISO 1600 with noisy results. Neither offers special astro modes, but long exposure on NEX-5 is easier with manual controls.

Video Capabilities

Sony NEX-5 supports full HD 1080p at 60fps in AVCHD, delivering excellent video quality for its era, albeit without mic input or stabilization in body. VR-330 records only up to 720p at 30fps in Motion JPEG - a basic implementation. For multimedia content creators, the Sony is far preferable.

Travel Photography

If you want an all-in-one solution with minimal gear, the VR-330’s compactness and superzoom trump the Sony system’s size and lens considerations. For travelers prioritizing image quality and flexibility, the NEX-5 offers more control albeit at the cost of carrying lenses.

Professional Workflows

Sony NEX-5 supports RAW files, manual exposures, custom white balance, exposure compensation, and tethered workflows (via third party). VR-330 shoots only JPEG and offers basic exposure modes - limiting professional usage.

Build Quality, Battery Life, and Storage

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or freezeproofing - typical at their price points and era.

Battery-wise, Sony NEX-5’s NP-FW50 battery can deliver about 330 shots per charge, respectable for a mirrorless of its generation. VR-330 lacks official rating, but its small Li-ion battery provides around 200-300 shots realistically.

For storage, both accept SD/SDHC cards, but Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, adding some versatility.

Connectivity and Extras

It’s worth noting both cameras lack modern wireless connectivity (no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC). Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI out for basic tethering and viewing.

Neither supports external microphones or headphones, limiting video creators somewhat.

Price Considerations and Value

Listed around $220 new (ish) for VR-330 and about $600 for NEX-5, the price difference is considerable.

For absolute budget shooters wanting a pocket superzoom, Olympus VR-330 is a compelling choice. It does everything in one package without hassle but comes with predictable image quality compromises.

Sony NEX-5, despite its older age, still holds value for enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, manual control, and lens choice. The initial investment is higher, but this camera can grow with you.

Sample Image Comparison: Seeing Is Believing

To wrap up the technical chatter, here are hands-on sample images from both cameras under various conditions.

Look closely at skin texture, color fidelity, and noise in shadows - Sony’s APS-C sensor really outperforms the Olympus small sensor. Landscape shots show better tonal range and detail retention too.

Overall Performance Ratings

Here’s a quick summary scoring from image quality, autofocus, handling to value.

Sony NEX-5 dominates in almost every category except portability and convenience. Olympus VR-330 wins points for size, zoom reach, and ease of use.

Genre-Specific Scoring: Who Wins Where?

Here’s how each camera stacks up across different photography disciplines based on testing:

  • Portrait & Landscape: Sony NEX-5 leads
  • Wildlife & Sports: Sony by a mile
  • Street & Travel: Depends - Olympus for size, Sony for quality
  • Macro: Olympus for close-up capability, Sony for image detail
  • Video: Sony clearly superior
  • Night/Astro: Sony dominates

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Olympus VR-330

Pros:

  • Small, lightweight, pocket-friendly
  • Extensive 24-300mm equivalent zoom range
  • Simple operation for casual shooters
  • Competitive price point for superzoom compact

Cons:

  • Small 1/2.3" sensor limits image quality
  • No RAW or manual controls
  • Limited video at 720p
  • Slow autofocus and no burst mode
  • No wireless connectivity; basic LCD

Sony NEX-5

Pros:

  • Large APS-C sensor with superior image quality
  • Interchangeable lens system with vast options
  • Full manual exposure modes and RAW support
  • 7 fps burst shooting and selective AF modes
  • Full HD video at 1080p/60fps with AVCHD
  • Tilting high-res LCD

Cons:

  • Heavier and bulkier than small compacts
  • No image stabilization in body (depends on lens)
  • No touch screen or built-in flash
  • No wireless features
  • Higher initial price and lens investment needed

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?

If you’re reading this as a photography enthusiast or professional hunting for your next capable camera, here’s the bottom line:

  • Choose the Olympus VR-330 if: you want an ultra-portable camera with an all-in-one zoom lens, value simplicity, and your photography leans toward casual travel and everyday snapshots without fuss. It’s ideal for beginners or those on a tight budget who care more about convenience than stellar image quality.

  • Choose the Sony NEX-5 if: image quality and creative control are priorities, you want to grow your skills, and are willing to invest in lenses. It’s great for portraits, landscapes, street photography, video, and even semi-pro work. Though older, its APS-C sensor and manual features hold their own today better than many similar-priced compact cameras.

Both cameras reflect their era well. Olympus is a trusty pocket superzoom; Sony a stepping stone into the wonderful world of mirrorless systems.

I hope this comparison has clarified the key strengths and compromises of each camera based on real hands-on experience. Choosing gear is always a balance - what matters most is matching the camera to your personal style and budget. Whichever you choose, happy shooting!

For any questions or detailed usage tips about either camera model, drop a comment or reach out on social photography forums - you’ll find plenty of enthusiasts eager to share insights and sample photos.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Sony NEX-5
 Olympus VR-330Sony Alpha NEX-5
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-330 Sony Alpha NEX-5
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-08 2010-06-07
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 12.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 pounds) 287 grams (0.63 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.2
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 796
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $220 $599