Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Sony W650
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony W650, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the W650 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-330 was launched 11 months earlier than the W650 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the VR-330 scores vs the W650 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony W650
| VR-330 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus VR-330
| W650 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony W650
| VR-330 | W650 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 offers exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony W650 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the W650.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and W650 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and W650.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony W650 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography information
Sony W650 Portrait photography information
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony W650 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography details
Sony W650 Sports photography details
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography factors
Sony W650 Travel photography factors
lighter than competition in class (158g)
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (124g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
Sony W650 Landscape photography factors
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging details
Sony W650 Vlogging details
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony W650 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $220 | $140 |