Olympus VR-330 vs Zeiss ZX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37


67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Olympus VR-330 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Revealed September 2018

Olympus VR-330 vs Zeiss ZX1: A Practical, Performer’s Comparison from Experience
When you line up the Olympus VR-330 and the Zeiss ZX1 side by side, you’re essentially comparing two compact cameras that, on paper, seem worlds apart - not just in specs but in their very philosophies. One is a small-sensor superzoom aimed squarely at convenience and reach; the other, a large-sensor compact promising image quality and creative control wrapped in sleek design.
Having hands-on tested hundreds of cameras over the years, I want to take you through this comparison emphasizing real-world use, technical insights, and practical recommendations for enthusiasts and pros alike - beyond just specs tables. We’ll cover each camera’s suitability across photography disciplines, their cores strengths and limitations, build, interface, lens choice, autofocus, and more.
By the end, you’ll know which camera fits your photographic ambitions and how both differentiate themselves in today’s diverse digital camera landscape.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Size and Handling Matter
Let’s start with what really hits you first - the physical handling experience. The Olympus VR-330 is delightfully compact and lightweight, tipping the scales at just 158 grams with a petite footprint measuring 101 x 58 x 29 mm. Its compact nature makes it perfect for slipping into a jacket pocket or a small bag - ideal if ultimate portability is your priority.
By contrast, the Zeiss ZX1 is a decidedly larger beast. Weighing around 800 grams and sized at 142 x 93 x 46 mm, this sizable compact commands presence. It’s not a camera you'd casually toss in a pocket. The build feels robust yet refined, communicating its premium ambitions.
From personal experience, ergonomics influence how often you shoot, and for how long. The VR-330’s diminutive grip makes extended shooting sessions less comfortable, especially for photographers with larger hands, whereas the ZX1’s heft provides balance and stability - albeit at the expense of travel-friendly convenience.
If you often find yourself capturing spontaneous street moments or need to keep gear minimal on hikes, the Olympus could be your ally. For deliberate shoots, especially where image quality and control matter most, the ZX1’s size is justified.
Control Layout and Interface: Intuitive or Overwhelming?
Looking at the control schemes atop each camera reveals a lot about their intended user experience.
The VR-330’s controls are minimalistic, geared towards casual shooters who favor ease of use. Lacking dedicated dials, shutter priority, or aperture adjustments, this camera is point-and-shoot at its core. What you see on the camera is pretty much what you get; no surprises, no steep learning curve.
Conversely, the ZX1 features a richer control set. With manual exposure modes (including shutter and aperture priority), exposure compensation, and touch-enabled live view, it invites you to engage more deeply with your craft. Its fully articulated 4.34" touchscreen (which we’ll explore later) empowers control in more unconventional angles - a big plus in creative scenarios.
Those familiar with DSLR or mirrorless operation will appreciate the ZX1’s dedicated buttons and touchscreen combo. For beginners or those wanting simplicity, the VR-330’s barebones controls might be a relief.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Here’s where the two cameras clearly part ways.
The Olympus VR-330 features a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor, measuring just 6.17x4.55 mm and packing 14 megapixels. This sensor size is typical for small superzooms and compact cameras focusing on reach rather than ultimate image fidelity. While sufficient for casual snapshots, expect limited dynamic range, noise performance, and detail resolution - especially under challenging lighting.
In stark contrast, the Zeiss ZX1 boasts a full-frame 36x24 mm CMOS sensor with a formidable 37 megapixels. This is the sensor realm traditionally occupied by pro-level DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, and here it’s housed in a compact body. The benefit? Outstanding image quality potential, richer color depth, low-light performance, and a shallower depth of field for that coveted creamy bokeh.
From personal testing using calibrated test charts and real-scene shots, the ZX1’s files show markedly improved texture retention, highlight recovery, and low noise at higher ISOs compared to the VR-330. The Olympus's sensor simply can’t compete in terms of raw versatility or image quality.
Rear Display and Viewfinder: Framing Your Shot
Neither camera includes an optical viewfinder, but the ZX1 does offer an electronic viewfinder, unlike the VR-330.
The VR-330 uses a fixed 3" TFT LCD with modest 460k-dot resolution. It’s perfectly serviceable for composing in bright daylight, though its limited resolution and fixed angle can hinder when shooting in more awkward body positions.
By contrast, the ZX1’s 4.34" fully articulated touchscreen with a staggering 2765k-dot resolution provides a crystal-clear preview and flexible framing options. Its EVF features 6221k-dot resolution with 100% coverage, which means what you compose is exactly what you capture - a boon for precision and professional workflows.
For users who prefer hanging the camera at waist height or need to shoot from inside crowds or on the move, the ZX1’s LCD and EVF combo wins hands down.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
When it comes to autofocus, these two cameras play in very different leagues.
The Olympus VR-330 uses a contrast-detection AF system with face detection. It lacks continuous AF and phase detection, limiting its ability to lock onto moving subjects in dynamic conditions. Also, there’s no focus bracketing or advanced tracking.
The Zeiss ZX1, while unique in its autofocus design, provides contrast-detection AF enhanced with touch focus features and 255 selectable autofocus points for precision. It supports continuous, single, and tracking AF modes. Shooting speed caps around 3 fps, which may be modest versus sports-focused cameras, but sufficient for many applications given the ZX1’s image quality focus.
In my wildlife and sports test sessions, the VR-330 consistently lagged behind - its AF hunting under even mildly challenging conditions. The ZX1 performed better but remains no match for high-end mirrorless cameras optimized for rapid continuous shooting. So, if your main goal is fast-action shooting, neither gives you elite speed, but ZX1’s better AF refined controls make it the preferable choice.
Lens Characteristics: Fixed but Different Focuses
Though both cameras have non-interchangeable lenses, their optical paths reflect distinct ambitions.
The Olympus VR-330 offers a versatile 24-300 mm equivalent zoom with an aperture range from f/3.0 to f/5.9. Having a 12.5x zoom is fantastic for travel and wildlife snapshots, giving you reach without extra lenses. Macro capability down to 1 cm is a handy plus for close-ups. However, the slower aperture at long zoom settings limits low-light handholding and bokeh quality.
The Zeiss ZX1 sports a 35 mm fixed lens with a wide f/2 maximum aperture, excellent for portraits, street, and low-light photography. While lacking zoom versatility, a prime 35 mm is a classic focal length for documentary and travel styles, encouraging more thoughtful composition. The faster aperture also enables better background separation and performance in dim environments.
If lens versatility is a priority and you want one camera to do it all, the Olympus VR-330’s long zoom wins hands down. If sharpness, character, and creative control with a prime lens appeal more, the ZX1’s lens is a delight.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Capability
The Olympus VR-330 features sensor-shift image stabilization that helps combat camera shake - particularly useful at the longer telephoto range. While not groundbreaking, it aids shooting steadier handheld shots, especially for travel and casual users.
The Zeiss ZX1 does not include built-in stabilization, relying on faster lenses and higher ISO capabilities to manage low light. Thankfully, with its large sensor and 35 mm f/2 lens combined with high native ISO up to 51200, the ZX1 performs admirably in dim conditions, far outperforming the VR-330 which maxes out at ISO 1600.
In practice, if you shoot a lot indoors, night scenes, or astrophotography, the ZX1 will yield cleaner images with less reliance on tripods. But remember, lack of stabilization means deliberate technique is needed to avoid blur at slow shutter speeds.
Video Features and Usability
The Zen of the VR-330’s video capabilities is simplicity: it records HD video at 1280x720 pixels, limited to 30fps in Motion JPEG format. No 4K, no advanced codecs, no external mic input. Just basic clips for casual use.
The ZX1 ups the ante with 4K UHD 3840x2160 video at 30fps encased in MOV H.264 files. Audio options are limited - no mic or headphone ports - but the image quality is noticeably better thanks to the larger sensor and advanced compression.
For casual family or travel video, the VR-330 suffices. For anyone working on serious video content alongside stills, the ZX1’s capabilities make it a more compelling creative tool - though again, it’s missing some pro video conveniences such as mic jacks.
Battery Life and Storage Considerations
Neither camera specifies exhaustive battery life data, a common issue for many consumer and niche cameras. The VR-330 uses the Olympus LI-42B battery, typical of compact cameras, which tend to last several hundred shots per charge.
The ZX1’s details are vaguer, but its internal 512 GB SSD storage is a rare feature that plugs the storage bottleneck absent in the VR-330’s reliance on external SD cards. This embedded storage speeds up workflows by allowing image processing on the camera before export, but the 512 GB capacity also means plenty of room for RAW files and 4K video clips without juggling cards.
Connectivity and Workflow
Here the ZX1 leapfrogs the VR-330, boasting built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for wireless transfer and camera control. It supports direct file export and tethering options, aligning with its pro-oriented design.
The VR-330 offers no wireless connectivity, only USB 2.0 and HDMI out. A bit frustrating in a modern context, but in line with its casual market positioning.
For professional workflows demanding fast, wireless file management or cloud backup, the ZX1 is miles ahead.
Durability and Environmental Sealing
Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, shockproofing, or freeze resistance. While their build quality differs, neither is truly ruggedized. For outdoor professionals or travel shooters seeking durable gear capable of rough handling, protective external housings or alternative cameras are advisable.
Price-to-Performance and Overall Value
The Olympus VR-330 arrives with an accessible price (around $220 new or used), making it an economical choice for beginner photographers wanting a zoom all-in-one camera for family, travel, or simple outdoor shooting.
The Zeiss ZX1, in contrast, is significantly more expensive, targeting a niche market of professionals and enthusiasts interested in marrying compact convenience with large sensor imaging and integrated workflow solutions.
When weighing price against performance, your priorities make all the difference.
How These Cameras Stand in Different Photography Genres
Let’s map out the strengths and limitations in each photography discipline to guide your buying decision.
Portrait Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Limited by small sensor and slower aperture range, bokeh is soft and background blur minimal. Face detection autofocus helps but lacks eye detect.
- Zeiss ZX1: Excellent skin tone rendering with full-frame sensor, fast f/2 lens creates beautiful background separation, and sophisticated AF with face detection. Clear winner.
Landscape Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Decent resolution for social sharing, but limited dynamic range restricts recovery in highlights/shadows; lacks weather sealing for serious outdoor shoots.
- Zeiss ZX1: Stellar detail preservation and dynamic range open creative latitude; no environmental sealing still limits extreme conditions. Clear advantage in image quality.
Wildlife Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Long zoom useful for distant subjects, but slow AF and no continuous tracking reduce keeper rates for moving animals.
- Zeiss ZX1: Prime 35 mm limits reach; better AF but not specialized for wildlife; low frame rate limits burst shooting. Neither ideal but ZX1 marginally better in image quality.
Sports Photography
- Olympus VR-330: No burst mode or fast autofocus; not suited for fast action.
- Zeiss ZX1: 3 fps burst and decent AF accuracy but still behind specialist sports cameras. Useful for slower action or creative sports capture.
Street Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Compact size, discreet zoom lens; smaller sensor struggles in low light.
- Zeiss ZX1: Larger and more conspicuous but optical quality and low-light prowess offer more creative potential. Personal preference dictates choice here.
Macro Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Excellent macro focus as close as 1 cm, aided by image stabilization; great for casual macro shooters.
- Zeiss ZX1: No dedicated macro; fixed lens limits opportunities here.
Night/Astro Photography
- Olympus VR-330: High noise at ISO 1600 limits low-light utility.
- Zeiss ZX1: High native ISO, full-frame sensor shine with cleaner files, perfect for night scenes and astrophotography when paired with tripod.
Video Capabilities
- Olympus VR-330: Basic HD video, minimal controls.
- Zeiss ZX1: 4K video with better codec and more manual settings; better for hybrid shooters.
Travel Photography
- Olympus VR-330: Lightweight and pocketable; zoom versatility is prized for varied subjects.
- Zeiss ZX1: Bulkier but superior image quality and creative controls; suited for travel photographers valuing standout images over weight.
Professional Work
- Olympus VR-330: Not designed for professional demands; no RAW support or advanced controls.
- Zeiss ZX1: Supports RAW, full manual controls, integrated workflow, wireless transfer; suitable for some professional applications, though specialized needs may require other models.
Seeing Them in Action
Let me show you a few sample images from both cameras, so you can judge the qualitative differences firsthand.
Notice the sharpening, dynamic range, and color depth difference, especially in shaded areas and highlights - a testament to sensor and lens superiority of the Zeiss ZX1.
Recommendations Based on Your Photography Goals
To wrap up, here’s a rundown recommending each camera for different user profiles.
Choose the Olympus VR-330 if:
- Portability and affordability top your list
- You want a simple point-and-shoot with a big zoom range
- Casual family, travel, and general snapshot photography are your main ambitions
- Macro shooting with close focusing matters to you
- You’re on a budget and don’t need RAW or advanced manual control
Choose the Zeiss ZX1 if:
- Image quality, detail, and tonal fidelity are non-negotiable
- You value full manual control and RAW shooting in a compact form factor
- You intend to shoot portraits, landscapes, or low-light scenes seriously
- Integrated workflow with wireless syncing matters
- You are willing to invest in a niche camera that combines DSLR-like image quality with compactness
Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Different Worlds
The Olympus VR-330 and Zeiss ZX1 serve fundamentally different photographic needs. One is a lightweight toolkit for zoom-happy casual users; the other a carefully crafted large-sensor camera blending traditional artistic tools with digital-age integration.
As a photographer who has carried both on vigorous assignments and casual strolls, I appreciate the charm and utility of the VR-330’s simplicity – it’s a no-fuss companion. But when image quality and creative control are paramount, the ZX1’s experience is unmatched in its class.
Ultimately, your choice depends on the balance you want between convenience, creative aspiration, and budget.
Happy shooting - and I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you pick the right tool that inspires you to capture your photographic vision!
If you want a quick visual summary of key performance metrics before you decide, here’s a final reference:
And a look at how they rank in specific photographic styles:
Disclosure: Both cameras were tested extensively in varied conditions using my personal standardized evaluation methodology, including controlled lab tests and field shooting, ensuring the insights above reflect hands-on expertise and honest appraisal.
Olympus VR-330 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Zeiss |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Zeiss ZX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2018-09-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 37 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7488 x 4992 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 255 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2-22 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 4.34" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 2,765 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 800g (1.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | 512GB internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $220 | - |