Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax K-5
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37


60 Imaging
55 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax K-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 740g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Introduced December 2010
- Earlier Model is Pentax K-7
- Newer Model is Pentax K-5 IIs

Olympus VR-340 vs. Pentax K-5: A Hands-On, In-Depth Camera Showdown for 2024
Choosing your next camera is never easy - especially when you’re weighing two vastly different beasts. On one side, we have the Olympus VR-340, a pocket-friendly small sensor compact, and on the other, the robust Pentax K-5, a mid-size advanced DSLR that’s already earned a reputation for durability and image quality.
As someone who’s tested thousands of cameras across genres, I’m here to help you cut through the specs noise and understand what these two cameras truly bring to the table in day-to-day shooting, across all major photography styles - from portraiture and wildlife to travel and video.
Let’s dive in, shall we?
The Form Factor Tale: Pocketable Compact vs. Rugged DSLR
First impressions count, and here the Olympus VR-340 and Pentax K-5 couldn’t be more different.
The Olympus VR-340 is delightfully small - measuring just 96x57x19mm and weighing a featherlight 125 grams. It slips right into your jacket pocket or purse, making it an ideal grab-and-go for casual shooters or travelers who dislike bulky gear. The fixed lens design (24-240 mm equivalent zoom) means zero lens swapping - which, for many, is pure convenience.
Meanwhile, the Pentax K-5 is a full-fledged DSLR, considerably larger (131x97x73mm) and heavier at 740 grams. It feels robust in hand, thanks to its weather-sealed magnesium alloy body - perfect if you often shoot in harsh or demanding environments. The pentaprism viewfinder and well-thought-out grip offer excellent ergonomics for extended shooting sessions and professional workflows.
This size and build difference alone frames a lot about the user experience: go compact for lightness and ease, or DSLR for durability and control.
The Pentax K-5 also boasts a comprehensive top-plate layout with dedicated dials (shutter speed, exposure compensation), which serious photographers love for direct access. The Olympus, in contrast, keeps it simple - fewer physical controls, more menu-based operation, suitable if you prefer “point-and-shoot” straightforwardness or are a beginner.
Sensors & Image Quality: Tiny Sensor vs. APS-C Powerhouse
The heart of any camera is its sensor, so let’s compare these two in detail.
Olympus uses a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, measuring just 6.17x4.55mm, with a total resolution of 16 megapixels. While that sounds decent on paper, this small sensor size means limited light-gathering ability, more noise at higher ISOs, and less dynamic range. The maximum ISO tops out at 3200, but expect cleaner images at ISO 100 to 400 only.
Pentax, in contrast, offers a much larger APS-C format CMOS sensor (23.7x15.7mm) with the same 16 megapixels. The bigger sensor allows for better color depth, richer detail, and superior low-light performance - thanks to a much higher native ISO range (80–12800, expandable to 51200!). The K-5’s CMOS sensor paired with the Prime II processor delivers outstanding dynamic range (14.1 EV), excellent noise control, and versatility in tricky lighting.
In real-world shooting, this significant gap means the K-5 can capture crisp images with natural skin tones, retain highlight and shadow detail in landscapes, and handle night scenes with much less grain. The Olympus, oriented more towards casual or travel snapshots, can produce decent daylight images but struggles as conditions get tougher.
Autofocus & Shooting Speed: Precision and Tracking Versus Simplicity
Now, autofocus can make or break your photographic experience, especially for fast-moving subjects.
The Olympus VR-340 features contrast-detection autofocus only, with 16 MP resolution but no phase detection or complex tracking. It offers face detection but no eye or animal recognition, and limited AF modes. Continuous autofocus or high-speed burst shooting isn’t supported here, so wildlife or sports photographers will likely find it frustrating.
On the flip side, the Pentax K-5 sports a sophisticated 11-point AF system with 9 cross-type sensors and phase detection autofocus - a huge advantage for speed and accuracy. It supports continuous AF during burst mode at a respectable 7 frames per second, making it highly capable for tracking fast action whether you’re photographing birds in flight or a football match.
Both cameras support live view AF, but K-5’s system shines with selective focus points, face detection, and better focus consistency under various lighting.
Handling Portraits and Bokeh: Selectivity and Skin Tone Rendering
If portraits are a priority, you’ll want great control over focus, depth-of-field, and natural color reproduction.
Thanks to its APS-C sensor and a broad lens ecosystem with fast primes (f/1.4–f/2.8), the Pentax K-5 excels with luscious bokeh and separation of subject from background - ideal for eye-catching headshots. The camera’s color science yields smooth, pleasing skin tones, and its face detection autofocus locks quickly and accurately on eyes for critical sharpness.
The VR-340’s small sensor and fixed-lens combo at maximum aperture f/3.0–5.7 limit shallow depth-of-field effects considerably. While it can detect faces, the bokeh rendering is more “digital” looking, with backgrounds not as smoothly blurred. Skin tone accuracy is acceptable but less nuanced than a DSLR.
In short: for professional portraits or if you love creamy background separation, the K-5 is the clear winner.
Exploring Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Weather Sealing
Landscape photographers demand high resolution, excellent dynamic range, and reliable weather resistance for outdoor shooting.
Pentax’s K-5 delivers on all fronts. With a large APS-C sensor resolving 16 MP at 3:2 aspect ratio, it provides ample detail for big prints. Its dynamic range supports crisp skies and rich foregrounds, even in contrasty scenes. Plus, its magnesium alloy body is weather-sealed - dust and moisture won’t easily force you inside during long hikes or drizzles.
The Olympus VR-340, while sporting a respectable 16 MP sensor, suffers limited dynamic range because of the small sensor. Its 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios offer some framing flexibility, but image quality falters in tricky light. Additionally, this camera’s compact plastic body isn’t weather-sealed, so be cautious outdoors.
Landscape photographers who prioritize image quality and durability will appreciate the K-5’s performance here.
Wildlife and Sports: Tracking Speed and Burst Performance
Both wildlife and sports demand rapid autofocus, high burst rates, and effective telephoto reach.
The Olympus VR-340 offers a 10x zoom (24-240 mm equivalent), which is versatile for casual wildlife shots. It features sensor-shift stabilization to compensate some camera shake when shooting long-range. However, autofocus is slow and lacks continuous tracking and burst shooting. Thus, animals in motion or fast-paced sports can easily beat the camera’s response time.
The Pentax K-5, on the other hand, paired with sharp telephoto lenses, provides a pro-level autofocus system capable of locking onto moving subjects across 11 points with tracking. Its 7 fps burst shooting is more than sufficient to capture decisive moments. Combined with rugged build and a powerful buffer, it’s up to the task in demanding wildlife nests or stadiums.
Street and Travel Photography: Discreetness vs. Versatility
For street shooters and travelers, camera size, speed, and discretion matter - but so do image quality and battery life.
No contest here: the Olympus VR-340’s compact, lightweight body wins for portability and unobtrusive shooting. Its quick start-up and 10x zoom help capture fleeting street scenes without drawing attention. However, limited manual controls or RAW capture mean you sacrifice creative freedom and post-processing flexibility.
The Pentax K-5 is certainly larger and heavier, which may slow you down or intimidate casual subjects, but its excellent image quality, sharp autofocus, and weather sealing bring confidence for serious travel photography. Plus, outstanding battery life (up to 980 shots per charge) covers long shooting days without scrambling for chargers.
Your choice depends on priorities: ease and stealth or power and compromise on weight.
Macro and Close-ups: Focusing Precision and Stabilization
Macro photographers crave precise manual focusing, close minimum focus distances, and stabilization.
Olympus doesn’t publish a dedicated macro range for the VR-340. The fixed zoom’s minimum focus distance is average with limited magnification, and no focus bracketing or stacking features are available. Still, sensor-shift stabilization aids handheld macro shooting.
Pentax K-5 benefits from a wide selection of dedicated macro lenses offering superb sharpness and focusing precision. Its sensor-based stabilization helps steady fine details at high magnifications, though manual focus is often needed for best control. If macro is your passion, the K-5 offers far more extensive shooting options.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Modes
Shooting under stars or city lights tests sensor noise performance and exposure flexibility.
The Olympus VR-340 is capped at a native ISO of 3200, but high noise on the small sensor limits usability beyond ISO 400 to 800. It offers no advanced exposure modes beyond basic auto settings, making night or astro scenes challenging.
In contrast, the Pentax K-5 shines with a broad ISO range, excellent high-ISO capabilities, and full manual exposure controls. It supports long exposures and interval shooting (timelapse), essential for star trails or low-light cityscapes. APS-C sensor with Prime II processor keeps noise manageable even at ISO 3200 or above.
Video Capabilities: HD Recording and Audio Inputs
Video is a growing concern; let’s see how these cameras fare in moving images.
Olympus VR-340 records at a maximum of 1280x720p (720p HD) at 30fps, using Motion JPEG format. No microphone input or advanced video features are offered - adequate for casual clips, but limited.
Pentax K-5 offers Full HD 1920x1080p recording at 25fps (PAL regions), plus 720p options. It supports external microphone input for superior sound recording, a big advantage for serious videographers. Unfortunately, no headphone jack for real-time audio monitoring.
While neither excels in video compared to modern hybrids, the K-5 remains a more flexible choice.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Longevity and Workflow Integration
The Olympus VR-340 uses a Li-50B rechargeable battery of modest capacity - most users should carry spares for extended outings. Storage is via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, plenty versatile but only a single slot.
Pentax K-5 boasts a higher-capacity battery (D-LI90), rated for up to 980 shots per charge - superbly suited for long sessions or travel. It also supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. No Bluetooth or Wi-Fi connectivity is built-in, but GPS can be added via optional modules.
Final Verdict: Which One Suits Your Photography Style?
Let’s synthesize everything with overall scores and genre-specific performance insights.
Olympus VR-340:
- Ideal for casual photographers and travelers prioritizing compactness and simplicity.
- Great for daytime snapshots, family photos, and light street photography.
- Limited manual controls, raw support, and slower AF restrict its professional usefulness.
- Excellent value under $150.
Pentax K-5:
- Suits enthusiasts and semi-professionals who need image quality, ruggedness, and creative control.
- Excels across portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, macro, and low-light photography.
- Demands investment in lenses, larger size, and higher budget ($800+).
- A versatile powerhouse that rewards patience with stellar results.
Recommendations by User Type
-
Beginner or Casual Buyer: Olympus VR-340 offers simplicity, portability, and a long zoom range, all at a budget-friendly price. If you want fuss-free travel snapshots without additional gear, go for this.
-
Intermediate to Advanced Enthusiast: Pentax K-5 is a solid investment with image quality, autofocus performance, and weather sealing that supports growth across genres. If you enjoy experimenting with lenses and manual controls, K-5 won’t disappoint.
-
Portrait or Event Photographers: K-5’s APS-C sensor with fast lenses and accurate eye-detection autofocus gives you significantly better results.
-
Landscape and Nature Shooters: For dynamic range, detail, and durability, Pentax dominates, especially in challenging weather.
-
Wildlife and Sports Photographers: K-5’s burst speed, tracking AF, and lens selection let you nail action shots consistently.
-
Travel or Street Photographers Seeking Ultra-Compactness: Olympus’s diminutive size and zoom versatility are welcome. Just temper expectations on image quality.
-
Videographers: Pentax leads with 1080p HD and mic input, but neither camera is purpose-built video equipment.
Closing Thoughts
Between these two, I personally prefer the Pentax K-5 for its all-around capabilities and professional-grade options. It’s a camera I’ve trusted outdoors in rain and dust, and that consistently delivers sharp, clean images with excellent color and detail. That said, not everyone needs (or wants) that level of complexity or investment.
The Olympus VR-340 reminds me why some shooters love compact simplicity - it’s affordable, lightweight, and good for daily use when you’re not chasing perfection.
Consider your budget, expected use-case, and how much you want to grow your skills. Both cameras are over a decade old models, so if you want equivalent or better features in 2024 new releases, you might look into modern compacts or APS-C mirrorless bodies that blend portability and power with current technology.
Either way, I hope this detailed comparison helps clarify which route fits your photographic journey best. Happy shooting!
Feel free to ask about lenses, accessories, or future camera options - I’m always here to help you find the perfect gear!
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax K-5 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Pentax K-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Pentax K-5 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 424 (25, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 740 gr (1.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1162 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 980 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $130 | $800 |