Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-340 was introduced 7 years prior to the G900 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the VR-340 scores versus the G900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh G900
| VR-340 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus VR-340
| G900 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 74 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh G900
| VR-340 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-340 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh G900 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 against the G900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and G900 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and G900.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh G900 to resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged VR-340 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $752 |