Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Samsung SL820 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Samsung SL820
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternative Name is IT100
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus VR-340 versus Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-340 was revealed 2 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the VR-340 grades versus the SL820 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung SL820

 VR-340 SL820 
LaunchedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Olympus VR-340

 SL820 VR-340 

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung SL820

 VR-340 SL820 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung SL820 has dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 versus Samsung SL820 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-340 and the SL820.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and SL820 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and SL820.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus VR-340 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL820 Portrait photography advice
34
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
26
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-340
Street photography with Samsung SL820
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
Sports photography with Samsung SL820
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Travel photography details
Samsung SL820 Travel photography details
69
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
57
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography information
Samsung SL820 Landscape photography information
43
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
32
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL820 Vlogging highlights
33
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
27
pretty wide (28mm)
comes with face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung SL820
 Olympus VR-340Samsung SL820
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus VR-340 Samsung SL820
Also referred to as - IT100
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.4-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 168 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-50B SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $130 $280