Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-340 was unveiled 4 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VR-340 scores against the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony A300
VR-340 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus VR-340
A300 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony A300
VR-340 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the VR-340 vs the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4b0/3b4b0944965150d07e5e169d8352b31ca25e2e57" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and A300 is 96 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0383d/0383dc9042ed97abd9a88c5453f04f8d03a9b873" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and A300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-340 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer VR-340 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b752/1b75217d9e71d44955b0ff6f9d463167a31b43a5" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cf18/6cf18d275fcf8d5c24f14ff0440f1907501beab2" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 632 grams (1.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $130 | $0 |