Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony W290, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and W290 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-340 was released 2 years later than the W290 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the VR-340 grades against the W290 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony W290

 VR-340 W290 
ReleasedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus VR-340

 W290 VR-340 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony W290

 VR-340 W290 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-340 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony W290 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-340 compared to the W290.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and W290 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and W290.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern VR-340 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
Sony W290 Portrait photography factors
34
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-340
Street photography with Sony W290
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography factors
Sony W290 Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
Travel photography with Sony W290
69
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
57
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography features
Sony W290 Landscape photography features
43
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
41
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging factors
Sony W290 Vlogging factors
33
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic support
28
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Sony W290
 Olympus VR-340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $130 $230