Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB50F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-1 was introduced 3 years before the WB50F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-1 scores against the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB50F

 XZ-1 WB50F 
Display resolution614k460kCrisper display (+154k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus XZ-1

 WB50F XZ-1 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2011Fresher by 35 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB50F

 XZ-1 WB50F 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-1 has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the WB50F.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and WB50F is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and WB50F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB50F will show more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older XZ-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
Portrait photography with Samsung WB50F
45
focusing manually
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
37
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography factors
Samsung WB50F Street photography factors
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
more heavy than average (275 grams)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
Samsung WB50F Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
great battery power (320 shots)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB50F Travel photography advice
62
great battery power (320 per charge)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (275 grams)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
54
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse function
47
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
Samsung WB50F Vlogging details
31
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than average (275 grams)
30
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus XZ-1Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus XZ-1 Samsung WB50F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-01-26 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 614 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 grams (0.61 pounds) 207 grams (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Retail price $567 $180