Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-1 was manufactured 6 months before the NEX-C3 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-1 grades against the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony NEX-C3
XZ-1 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus XZ-1
NEX-C3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-C3
XZ-1 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | August 2011 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-1 versus the NEX-C3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and NEX-C3 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-C3 will give extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 400 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $567 | $343 |