Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the W290 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and W290 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The XZ-1 was released 24 months later than the W290 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-1 scores versus the W290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony W290

 XZ-1 W290 
IntroducedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 24 months
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus XZ-1

 W290 XZ-1 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W290

 XZ-1 W290 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 features outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has sizing of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 and the W290.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and W290 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and W290.

To sum up, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony W290 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
Sony W290 Portrait photography info
45
focusing manually
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.63")
27
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Sony W290
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
small sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than competition (275g)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W290 as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
good battery power (320 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.63")
has no phase detect autofocus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography information
Sony W290 Travel photography information
62
good battery power (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (275g)
MP count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
57
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography advice
Sony W290 Landscape photography advice
54
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
good battery power (320 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.63")
does not have Timelapse function
41
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging features
Sony W290 Vlogging features
31
relatively wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition (275 grams)
28
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W290
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-26 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3664 x 2752 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 614 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 gr (0.61 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $567 $230