Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FS25 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the FS25 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FS25
XZ-2 iHS | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FS25 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS25
XZ-2 iHS | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae08c/ae08c2565c979cdb730de82cb319e9d8024ad117" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FS25 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0817/e0817a8c1299ddad837149049ababec1177eed88" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and FS25.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS contains the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5dd8/e5dd833fbc86d4b5498963333b393b686cf7e9c9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a79/94a79022b73db7f64516b4a6f69e0e372e8110e2" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 148 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $450 | $230 |