Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FX78 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 24 months after the FX78 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the FX78 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX78
XZ-2 iHS | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FX78 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX78
XZ-2 iHS | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FX78.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FX78 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FX78.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 200 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $450 | $210 |