Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3e2/ab3e2b95d505b4b0ff0bfe0dc0d284b98f4a2d41" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Released October 2009
- Refreshed by Panasonic GF2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic GF1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GF1 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the GF1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the GF1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic GF1
XZ-2 iHS | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | October 2009 | More recent by 39 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GF1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic GF1
XZ-2 iHS | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has specifications of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic GF1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the GF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77869/778695bf724d36490f35a310abc3d372b62d9eb5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and GF1 is 85 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a75/a6a752cb6732aa3fe9716d7ce2ac73641a2635c1" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and GF1.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS contains the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3047a/3047aa8e037720b1ee9c83d512a83c0b79211a96" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4590/d459051ab25067ca23ea7aaa0db8431b4462264e" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-10-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 385g (0.85 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 513 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 380 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $400 |