Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Successor is Pentax K20D
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K10D, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the K10D (10MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and K10D (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 6 years later than the K10D and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the K10D with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K10D. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax K10D
XZ-2 iHS | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | December 2006 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 210k | Crisper display (+710k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
K10D | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K10D
XZ-2 iHS | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax K10D has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax K10D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the K10D.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and K10D is 85 and 59 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and K10D.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K10D |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2006-12-15 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $700 |