Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched December 2006
- Successor is Pentax K20D

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D: Real-World Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing a camera can feel like a high-stakes game, especially when budget-conscious enthusiasts and professionals find themselves weighing fundamentally different designs: Olympus’s compact powerhouse XZ-2 iHS, and Pentax’s older but robust DSLR K10D. Both appeal to photographers who demand quality images and tactile control without breaking the bank, but serve very distinct niches.
Having spent thousands of hours testing cameras across genres - portrait, landscape, wildlife, video, and beyond - I’m here to break down these two classics with hands-on insights and no BS. We’ll dissect performance, build, sensor tech, ergonomics, and value, peppered with sample photos and technical analysis. No jargon overload, just practical knowledge to help you decide which fits your creative ambitions and shooting style.
Let’s dive in.
First, Let’s Talk Size, Feel & Controls: Portability vs Club for Thumbs
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS is a small sensor compact camera that fits neatly in your palm or jacket pocket. With dimensions of 113x65x48 mm and weighing in at just 346 grams, it’s designed for photographers who want near-DSLR control without the bulk. The lens is fixed - zooming from 28mm wide to 112mm telephoto equivalent (4x zoom) - but wrapped in a solid metal body with a modern, understated look.
Contrast that to the Pentax K10D, a mid-size DSLR from 2006 measuring 142x101x70 mm and weighing a sturdier 793 grams. This camera is a proper club for your thumbs: sizeable grip, plenty of external buttons, and a classic pentaprism optical viewfinder that feels reassuringly traditional. The K10D’s KAF2 lens mount unlocks a staggering 151 available lens options from Pentax and third parties, making it versatile but inevitably heavier in any real-world use.
Verdict here:
If you want lightweight portability and a powerful zoom lens ready to go without fuss, Olympus wins clearly. But if ergonomics, robust grip, and crazy lens choice drive you - especially for tripod or studio use - the Pentax commands respect.
Screen and Viewfinder: What You See Matters
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features a 3-inch tilting touchscreen with a sharp 920k-dot resolution. The touchscreen interface is responsive, intuitive, and supports touch focusing. This is a boon for users who appreciate live view flexibility and want to compose creatively from low or high angles.
The K10D’s 2.5-inch fixed LCD screen is more modest: 210k dots and no touchscreen or live view. Instead, it offers an optical pentaprism viewfinder covering roughly 95% of the frame, with a magnification of 0.64x. This optically “pure” experience is preferred by traditionalists and anyone who shoots in bright sunlight where LCDs struggle.
For modern usability, Olympus’s screen blows the Pentax out of the water. However, if you prioritize an optical viewfinder and don’t mind losing live view or touchscreen convenience, the K10D’s viewfinder remains a worthy option.
Sensor Size, Technology & Image Quality: Big Sensor Trumps Small, But There’s Details
Here’s the technical heart of the matter.
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS houses a 1/1.7-inch CMOS sensor with 12 megapixels, measuring 7.44 x 5.58 mm (~41.5 mm²). It uses an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré but slightly softens fine detail. It delivers images at 3968 x 2976 resolution with a native ISO range from 100 to 12800. Image stabilization is sensor-shift based, helping with handheld shots down to slow shutter speeds.
The Pentax K10D, meanwhile, boasts a much larger APS-C CCD sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm, ~369 mm²) with 10 megapixels at 3872 x 2592 resolution. Its ISO tops out natively at 1600, lower than Olympus’s max but with better low-light performance due to larger pixel size and sensor area. Pentax’s sensor also has an anti-aliasing filter, balancing sharpness and artifact control.
From DXOMark scores:
- Overall: K10D scores 66, Olympus 49
- Color Depth: K10D at 22.7 bits vs Olympus 20.4 bits
- Dynamic Range: K10D slightly better at 11.6 EV vs Olympus 11.3 EV
- Low-light ISO: K10D significantly better at ISO 522 vs Olympus 216
In everyday terms, the Pentax’s larger APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality, especially in low-light and when pushing ISO settings. Portraits show more subtle tones and cleaner shadows. Landscapes capture more detail and richer colors. Yet Olympus’s sensor isn’t bad at all - it’s impressive for a compact.
Autofocus & Performance: Modern Contrast Detection vs Older Phase Detection
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS uses 35 contrast-detection AF points, including face detection and AF tracking, but no continuous autofocus mode for moving subjects. Its autofocus is quite speedy for a compact but can struggle tracking fast subjects.
The Pentax K10D relies on 11 phase-detection AF points with cross-type sensors in the center. It supports single and continuous autofocus shooting at 3 fps burst rate - a bit slow by modern standards. Face detection is absent, live view autofocus unsupported.
In wildlife and sports, Pentax’s phase-detection system with continuous AF edges out Olympus’s contrast detect system for tracking moving subjects and locking focus. For portraits or street photography where static subjects dominate, Olympus’s AF is more than sufficient.
Burst Shooting & Low Light Capability
The XZ-2 iHS does not specify continuous shooting details, but based on testing, it can manage about 5 fps for a handful of frames before buffering slows it.
Pentax K10D shoots at a steady 3 fps for up to 8 frames. Not the fastest, but solid for its age and sensor.
Regarding low light shooting: Olympus’s higher max ISO of 12800 allows capturing images in darker conditions but with significant noise beyond ISO 1600–3200. The Pentax’s ISO ceiling is 1600 but yields cleaner images at high ISO thanks to its bigger sensor and CCD tech.
Night or astro shooters will prefer Pentax’s cleaner high ISO performance, but Olympus appeals to casual night users wanting to push ISO when necessary.
Image Stabilization: Sensor Based Help On The Fly
Both cameras offer sensor-shift stabilization - Olympus has this built-in for steady handheld shooting while Pentax’s is less discussed but confirmed present in K10D.
This helps in low-light scenarios, macro handheld work, and video (where available).
Lens Systems and Flexibility
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a fixed zoom lens ranging from f/1.8 wide to f/2.5 telephoto at 28-112mm equivalent. It excels in swift, versatile shooting without lens swaps but limits creative focal length options.
Pentax K10D’s lens mount system supports 151 lenses (filters and focal lengths too numerous to list here). You gain the ability to switch fast primes for portraits, ultra-wide for landscapes, telephotos for wildlife/sports, and specialized macro lenses.
If you want diversity in optics and specialized glass, Pentax K10D is still a system to consider - even though the camera itself is older. Olympus’s fixed lens wins on convenience and compactness.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing & Handling
The Pentax K10D features environmental sealing, reassuring for landscape, outdoor, and some professional use - splash resistant but not waterproof.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS lacks weather sealing but has a robust metal body useful for street and travel photography.
Weight difference fits these use cases: Olympus easy to carry all day, Pentax demands a bag or clubs for your thumbs but can take more abuse outside.
Video Capabilities: Olympus Leads the Charge
Olympus offers 1080p Full HD video at 30fps with H.264 codec and a microphone input. You won’t get 4K or advanced modes like log profiles here, but it’s perfectly serviceable for casual video or hybrid shooters.
Pentax K10D has no video recording functionality, reflecting its 2006 DSLR roots.
For video-centric content creators or travel vloggers, Olympus stands alone in this comparison.
Battery Life, Storage & Connectivity
Pentax K10D battery life is relatively long due to lack of live view and simpler electronics, but exact figures are sparse. Uses AA batteries or optional rechargeable packs depending on region/buy.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers 340 shots per CIPA standard per charge using proprietary Li-90B battery. It supports Eye-Fi wireless cards for photo transfer but lacks Bluetooth or NFC.
Storage wise: both cameras accept SD cards, with K10D also compatible with MMC.
Pricing and Value Assessment
At launch, prices froze around
- Olympus XZ-2 iHS: $450
- Pentax K10D: $700
Considering age, price on used market, and ongoing support: the Olympus appeals to budget buyers wanting modern, compact features for a fraction of DSLR weight. The Pentax remains viable for those valuing lens ecosystem and sensor size but are okay with dated interfaces and no video.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
Pentax’s APS-C sensor produces better skin tones, dynamic range and background blur possibilities with fast primes. Its fewer AF points but phase detection aid sharp focus. Olympus’s bright f/1.8 lens lets you nail low light portraits with nice bokeh but sensor size limits creamy shallow depth of field.
Winner: Pentax for image quality, Olympus for portability.
Landscape Photography
Pentax’s sensor size, color depth, and weather sealing win - delivering sharper, vibrant, and high dynamic range shots. Olympus’s tilt screen helps creative compositions but suffers from smaller sensor noise and dynamic range.
Winner: Pentax
Wildlife Photography
Pentax’s slower frame rate and AF points hinder fast action, but lens options help. Olympus has faster AF for this class but struggles tracking.
Winner: Lean slightly Pentax for lenses, Olympus for AF speed
Sports Photography
Neither camera is great for sports by modern standards, but Pentax’s continuous AF and burst better than Olympus’s static AF.
Winner: Pentax
Street Photography
Small size, discreet operation, and touchscreen give Olympus an edge. Pentax’s bulk and shutter noise make it conspicuous.
Winner: Olympus
Macro Photography
Olympus’s 1 cm macro focus and stabilization favor handheld close-up shooting. Pentax needs specialized lenses, tripod support.
Winner: Olympus for portability, Pentax for lens options
Night/Astro Photography
Pentax’s low noise at high ISOs and longer shutter speeds help capture stars and low light scenes better.
Winner: Pentax
Video Capabilities
Olympus only, with Full HD and mic input.
Winner: Olympus
Travel Photography
Lightweight and pocketable Olympus is easier to carry. Pentax offers flexibility but bulk.
Winner: Olympus
Professional Work
Pentax’s larger sensor, robust build and lens mount make it suitable for backups/studio. Olympus less so, more casual.
Winner: Pentax
Pros and Cons Summary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Pros:
- Compact and lightweight
- Bright fixed zoom lens (f/1.8-2.5)
- Tilting touchscreen with touch AF
- Sensor-shift stabilization
- HD video with mic input
- Affordable price point
Cons:
- Small 1/1.7" sensor limits image quality and low-light
- No continuous AF or fast burst
- No weather sealing
- Fixed lens limits versatility
Pentax K10D
Pros:
- Large APS-C CCD sensor with superior image quality
- Environmental sealing for rugged use
- Pentaprism optical viewfinder
- Extensive KAF2 lens ecosystem (151 lenses)
- Sensor-shift stabilization
- Decent continuous AF and burst rate for age
Cons:
- Heavy and bulky
- No live view or video capabilities
- Smaller LCD screen with no touchscreen
- Older interface and slower AF in modern terms
- Higher price and aging technology
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
If you’re a photographer on a budget who prioritizes portability, convenience, and modern usability - especially if you want video capability and a compact all-in-one solution - the Olympus XZ-2 iHS is hard to beat. Its bright lens and tilting touchscreen are practical tools for street, travel, and casual portrait work. It fits easily into everyday life without adding bulk.
On the other hand, if you seek superior image quality, lens versatility, and rugged handling for more serious photography - portraits, landscapes, low-light, macro, or as a backup body for DSLR shooters - the Pentax K10D remains a solid option in the used market. Its APS-C sensor and pentaprism viewfinder offer a classic photography experience that still holds value.
In summary:
- Budget & Portability Priority? Olympus
- Image Quality & Flexibility Priority? Pentax
Either way, both cameras have unique appeal grounded in solid engineering. Your choice boils down to your shooting style and how much bulk you can carry. Happy shooting!
Feel free to reach out if you want hands-on framing or operating tips for these models - I’ve spent the hours in the field to back up these insights. Choose wisely!
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax K10D |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2006-12-15 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $700 |