Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 153g - 101 x 65 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the I-10 (12MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and I-10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years after the I-10 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the I-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio I-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax I-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax I-10
| XZ-2 iHS | I-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax I-10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| I-10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax I-10
| XZ-2 iHS | I-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax I-10 has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the I-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and I-10 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and I-10.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS offers the larger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax I-10 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio I-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio I-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Prime |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 153 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 101 x 65 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $310 |