Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS35
- Successor is Panasonic ZS45
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS40 (18MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL9 was released 4 years later than the ZS40 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL9 scores against the ZS40 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS40
E-PL9 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | January 2014 | More recent by 50 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS40 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS40
E-PL9 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 features external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS40 has specifications of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the ZS40.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and ZS40 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The graphic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and ZS40.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS40 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 240 grams (0.53 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $450 |