Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Revealed August 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax X-5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and X-5 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and X-5 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 4 months after the X-5 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the X-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax X-5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax X-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax X-5
XZ-2 iHS | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
X-5 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax X-5
XZ-2 iHS | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | August 2012 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax X-5 has sizing of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax X-5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the X-5.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and X-5 is 85 and 65 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and X-5.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax X-5 will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax X-5 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax X-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax X-5 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2012-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 22-580mm (26.4x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 230 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 9.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 595 grams (1.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $450 | $230 |