Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and CX1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the CX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX1
XZ-2 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
CX1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX1
XZ-2 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the CX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41a78/41a782e4ee83175a5561330e1bffaf2383c24c55" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and CX1 is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99f19/99f199fc56e363cd9bb44ca808b0de57923b97b9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and CX1.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver more detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40e37/40e37003dc3e57b0051b087cb78fb6eafb42d085" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf944/cf944a7b686592d643bb6094e1081865d8e569e9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $450 | $299 |