Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and G900 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and G900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 6 years prior to the G900 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the G900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh G900
XZ-2 iHS | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
G900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 63 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh G900
XZ-2 iHS | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the G900.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and G900 is 85 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and G900.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh G900 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $450 | $752 |