Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/1.7").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
XZ-2 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GR Digital III | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
XZ-2 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GR Digital III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital III is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital III.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $399 |