Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/1.7").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 XZ-2 iHS GR Digital III 
RevealedDecember 2012July 2009More recent by 42 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GR Digital III XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III

 XZ-2 iHS GR Digital III 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution920k920kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital III is 85 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GR Digital III.

Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
46
manual focus
provides face detection focus
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
40
manual focus
exports RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
66
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
55
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography factors
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (340 CIPA)
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
61
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (346g)
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
63
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography info
55
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse function
45
manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3")
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging details
36
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic support
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh GR Digital III
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-12-18 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346g (0.76 pounds) 208g (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $450 $399