Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
59 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched February 2010
- Superseded the Sigma SD14
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD15, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe WB800F was released 2 years after the SD15 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WB800F matches up versus the SD15 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD15. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD15
WB800F | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 36 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Samsung WB800F
SD15 | WB800F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD15
WB800F | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F has got external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD15 has sizing of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD15 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WB800F and the SD15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and SD15 is 92 and 59 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and SD15.
Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB800F featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give greater detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer WB800F should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD15 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-01-07 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 750g (1.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $300 | $1,500 |