Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ35W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| HZ35W | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ35W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HZ35W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ35W is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ35W.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS comes with the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow DOF easier. The newer XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $300 |