Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ST150F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured at a similar time to the ST150F and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the ST150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung ST150F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung ST150F
| XZ-2 iHS | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| ST150F | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung ST150F
| XZ-2 iHS | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung ST150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the ST150F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ST150F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and ST150F.
All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung ST150F will show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung ST150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 114 gr (0.25 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $450 | $300 |