Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed around the same time to the WB30F so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung WB30F
| XZ-2 iHS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WB30F | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB30F
| XZ-2 iHS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WB30F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WB30F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WB30F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB30F will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $450 | $180 |
