Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Also Known as EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-330 was released 7 years prior to the HX200V which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-330 scores versus the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony HX200V
E-330 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-330
HX200V | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | Newer by 74 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+707k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX200V
E-330 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 against the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00776/00776c12ca44fa81079e72f48d0b1482858fcac1" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and HX200V is 65 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7796/b7796a8eef0cfcb30abec940189e66194ee0bf7d" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and HX200V.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX200V will result in more detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83ea4/83ea45f07885cfdd06c4a90e5922e569da206fa4" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83920/8392052f1ce0fb0f7a8db8eeba1b86c63927461f" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,100 | $480 |