Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Introduced May 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony HX100V
  • Refreshed by Sony HX300
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

The E-330 was released 7 years prior to the HX200V which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-330 scores versus the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony HX200V

 E-330 HX200V 

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-330

 HX200V E-330 
IntroducedMay 2012March 2006Newer by 74 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kCrisper display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony HX200V

 E-330 HX200V 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 against the HX200V.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and HX200V is 65 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and HX200V.

Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX200V will result in more detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Sony HX200V Portrait photography features
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (7MP)
45
manual focus
MP count decent (18MP)
has face detect focusing
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony HX200V
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
51
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition (583g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography details
Sony HX200V Sports photography details
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
56
amazing zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery life (450 shots)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition (616 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (7MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
57
better than average battery life (450 CIPA)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (27mm)
very long reach (810mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (583 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Sony HX200V Landscape photography factors
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse mode
50
manual focus
rather wide (27mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
better than average battery life (450 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging highlights
Sony HX200V Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
27
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (583g)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Olympus E-330 vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony HX200V
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2006-03-18 2012-05-11
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 12.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 583g (1.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 450 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $1,100 $480