Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched December 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WB700 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung WB700

 XZ-2 iHS WB700 
LaunchedDecember 2012December 2010More recent by 25 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k614kSharper screen (+306k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 WB700 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB700

 XZ-2 iHS WB700 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WB700.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WB700 is 85 and 98 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WB700.

As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB700 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Portrait photography highlights
46
has manual focus
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
30
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB700 as a Street photography camera
66
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than others in class (346g)
49
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low max ISO (0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Samsung WB700
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
great battery pack (340 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
28
good MP (14 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography factors
Samsung WB700 Travel photography factors
61
great battery pack (340 shots)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
good MP (14MP)
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography details
Samsung WB700 Landscape photography details
55
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
38
fast maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging advice
Samsung WB700 Vlogging advice
36
reasonably wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes mic support
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than others in class (346g)
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB700
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSamsung WB700
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Samsung WB700
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-12-18 2010-12-28
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 pounds) -
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots One One
Retail cost $450 $300