Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WB700 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung WB700
XZ-2 iHS | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | December 2010 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WB700 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB700
XZ-2 iHS | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WB700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WB700 is 85 and 98 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WB700.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB700 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB700 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $300 |