Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NEX-3N (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 months prior to the NEX-3N so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the NEX-3N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-3N
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NEX-3N | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-3N
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2013 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the NEX-3N.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-3N is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-3N.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 480 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $450 | $399 |